About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



40 Wayne L. Rev. 201 (1993-1994)
Negligent Homicide Prosecutions Stemming from Child Passenger Restraint Infractions: A Limit to Prosecutorial Discretion

handle is hein.journals/waynlr40 and id is 213 raw text is: NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE PROSECUTIONS
STEMMING FROM CHILD PASSENGER
RESTRAINT INFRACTIONS: A LIMIT TO
PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION
I. INTRODUCTION
During the past decade, prosecutors across the country have
repeatedly attempted to sustain criminal charges against drivers,
usually parents, whose failure to secure children in an automobile
child restraint system mandated by law has contributed to the
death of a child. To date, the majority of these charges have been
dismissed, pleaded down or pleaded out. Those which have
been fully tried have ended in acquittal. Still, media reports suggest
that not only will such charges continue to be brought, but also
that there is strong belief among many prosecutors that these
charges are both proper and winnable.' Some critics, on the other
hand, submit that these indictments are the misguided efforts of
well meaning but over zealous prosecutors. More belligerent critics
hint that the charges are the products of sanctimonious crusaders
or racist, publicity-hungry politicians who abuse both prosecutorial
discretion and the legislative intent of the child restraint laws.2
It is a basic tenet of criminal law that a prosecutor has broad
discretion in deciding whether to initiate a prosecution and, if so,
what charges to file.3 This discretion is not, however, without
limits.4 For instance, when two statutes, one a felony and the
other a misdemeanor, cover the same subject matter, charges must
be brought under the more specific enactment.5 However, when
1. Rosalind Resnick, Car-Seat Trial Ends, Leaving a Legal Void, NAT'L
L.J., May 20, 1991, at 8.
2. Id.; see also Rick Bragg & Susan Benesch, A Question of Guilt, ST.
PETERSBURG TxmS, Apr. 28, 1991, at IA; Misplaced Zeal, NAT'L L.J., May 20,
1991, at 16.
3. People v. O'Shea, 385 N.W.2d 768, 771 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986); see
also 63A AM. JUR. 2D Prosecuting Attorneys § 24 (1984).
4. People ex rel. Leonard v. Papp, 194 N.W.2d 693, 698 (Mich. 1972).
5. People v. Shaw, 183 N.W.2d 390, 391 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970), leave to
appeal denied, 385 Mich. 760 (1971).