About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



74 Rutgers U.L. Rev. 111 (2021-2022)
Credibility in an Age of Algorithms

handle is hein.journals/rutlr74 and id is 123 raw text is: 







CREDIBILITY IN AN AGE OF ALGORITHMS


                         Julia  Simon-Kerr*

                              ABSTRACT

      Evidence   law   has   a   credibility problem.   Artificial
    intelligence creators will soon be marketing tools for assessing
    credibility in the courtroom. While credibility is a vital concept
    in the United States legal system, there is deep ambiguity within
    the law about its function. American jurisprudence assumes that
    impeachment   evidence tells us about a witness's propensity for
    truthfulness. Yet this same jurisprudence focuses fact-finders on
    a distinct inquiry: whether a witness has the status or outward
    appearance  of a person who is worthy of belief. In the face of this
    equivocation  about what  credibility in the legal system is or
    should be, the terms of engagement  will be set by the creators of
    algorithms in accordance  with their interests.

      This Article illuminates the actual and purported function of
    credibility in  the  law  through   analogies  to two   existing
    algorithmic products. One  is the U.S. financial credit score. The
    other is China's experiment with a social credit scoring system.
    These analogies show  that a predictive approach to credibility is
    structurally distinct from a worthiness-centered one. They also
    deepen  critiques of both approaches as they appear  in current
    practice and as we contemplate  the credibility of the future.






  * Professor of Law, The University of Connecticut School of Law. Many thanks to Steven
Wilf for early conversations about social credit and credibility. Thanks to Kiel Brennan-
Marquez, Teneille Brown, Bennett Capers, Virginia Kerr, Jamelia Morgan, Anna Roberts,
Richard Wilson, and Carly Zubrzycki for comments on this and other drafts. Thanks also
to participants at the Rutgers and Pepperdine Faculty Workshops, the Evidence Summer
Workshop, and attendees at the Wesleyan Center for the Humanities Lecture Series for
helpful feedback on versions of this work. Thanks to Cait Barrett for her outstanding
research assistance.


111