About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



82 Pub. Admin. Rev. 977 (2022)
Epistemic Decolonization of Public Policy Pedagogy and Scholarship

handle is hein.journals/pbcamnstn82 and id is 996 raw text is: 

Received: 7 October 2022
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13560

EDITORIAL



Epistemic decolonization of public policy pedagogy

and scholarship


Sanjay   K. Pandey' I Yuan (Daniel) Cheng2


|  Jeremy L.   Hall3


'Trachtenberg School, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
2Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
3School of Public Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Correspondence
Jeremy L. Hall, School of Public Administration College of Community Innovation and Education 528 West Livingston St., DPAC 448R Orlando, FL 32801, USA.
Email: jeremy.hall@ucf.edu


Epistemic decolonization looms  large in the academic
Zeitgeist with diverse  disciplines convening sessions
and  even entire conferences on  epistemic decoloniza-
tion.' This powerful perspective has  been  developed
and  honed  by  trailblazing indigenous scholars. Linda
Tuhiwai  Smith, a pioneering  indigenous social justice
scholar  and  author  of  Decolonizing  Methodologies,
underscores  the broader relevance of this perspective,
I think indigenous methodologies  have  something  to
contribute beyond  solving our own problems, or resolv-
ing our own issues, or contributing to our own societies.
I think our  methodologies   can  contribute to  wider
agendas  for research.2 A recent conference  call suc-
cinctly describes the goals of epistemic decolonization:
Current   discussions  on  epistemic   decolonization
acknowledge   the need to reflect on the intrinsic white-
ness, colonial legacies, and power imbalances implicit in
knowledge   production practices in the field of philoso-
phy  of science (Epistemic Decolonization, 2022 - From
Theory to Practice).
   We  do not address epistemic decolonization in all its
richness and complexity; instead, we have  the modest
goal  of exploring epistemic  consequences   of power
imbalances among   disciplinary bodies of knowledge. We
pursue this goal of raising awareness about disciplinary
decolonization by focusing on and  interrogating public
policy pedagogy  and  scholarship.3 Public policy peda-
gogy  and  scholarship, or broadly speaking, academic
understanding  of formulating and executing sound pub-
lic policy, remains mired in narrow and somewhat insular
disciplinary projects. Put simply, public policy scholar-
ship continues to be  viewed  as a siloed mishmash  of
political science and economics that is structurally self-
sufficient and appropriately stands  apart from  other
vibrant bodies of disciplinary knowledge such as sociol-
ogy, psychology, and  public administration (see Adams
et al., 2016; MacRae Jr & Feller, 1998).


Public Admin Rev. 2022;82:977-985.


   The  academic  obliviousness to  the role of public
administration in public policy formulation and imple-
mentation   stands  in  sharp  contrast to   real-world
accounts of the central and consequential role of public
administration.4 We  discuss  academic  structuring of
public policy pedagogy and scholarship in turn, and con-
clude by  summing   up the implications for disciplinary
decolonizing.


ACADEMIC STRUCTURING OF PUBLIC POLICY
PEDAGOGY AND SCHOLARSHIP

Academic  structures, devised for the sake of organizing
intellectual activities of teaching and scholarship, bestow
legitimacy to these activities and acquire a taken-for-
granted character. These structures, however, are not a
part of the  natural order of things (Anheier, 2019;
Pandey  & Johnson, 2019). Indeed, these structures are a
product  of historical accidents, path dependence, and
cooperation  and  conflict among  academic   and  non-
academic constituencies (Henry, 1975; Kettl, 2022).
   It is important to recognize these historical accidents
and  continuing  power   struggles over  public  policy
teaching and scholarship. We make a preliminary effort to
describe the historical and social structuring of public pol-
icy pedagogy and scholarship; an effort that is necessarily
limited and tinted by our perspective as public adminis-
tration scholars. We  begin  with  observations  about
public policy pedagogy  and  move  on  to public policy
scholarship.


STRUCTURING OF PUBLIC POLICY PEDAGOGY

The most  recognizable academic credential in public pol-
icy today is Master of Public Policy (MPP). Whereas the

          © 2022 by The American Society for Public Administration.  977


wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/puar