About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



117 Nw. U. L. Rev. Online 1 (2022-2023)

handle is hein.journals/nulro117 and id is 1 raw text is: 






Copyright 2022 by Jeremy Wright
Northwestern University Law Review                              Vol. 117



ARBITRATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE NEED
      FOR   LEGISLATIVE INTERVENTION


                                                      Jeremy  Wright


ABSTRACT-Since passage of the   Federal Arbitration Act in 1925, arbitral
proceedings have played an important role in American dispute resolution
processes. However, the frequent application of the FAA to employment
contexts is a relatively new phenomenon. Over the past thirty years, the
Supreme  Court has heralded an explosion in the use of mandatory arbitration
agreements in employee contracts, reshaping employment law and limiting
workers' access to courts. Vast swaths of American workers are now bound
to agreements they know  little about that provide them only precarious
protections. Justifiable backlashes to this terraforming of the employment
law landscape have begun to sprout up in various workplaces.
     This Essay suggests that the uninhibited expansion of arbitration to
employment  contexts has been a net negative for American workers. While
current arbitration procedures are suitable for the commercial business-to-
business disputes the FAA originally envisioned, these procedures have not
been appropriately modified for workplace contexts, making such cases ripe
for abuse. Documenting the history of the FAA and modern Court decisions
regarding it, this Essay contends that Congress will need to act boldly in
order to develop a system of arbitration suitable for workers.

AUTHOR-J.D. Candidate, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, 2022;
B.S., Adelphi University, 2012. Special thanks to James R. Ferguson for
thoughtful, comprehensive comments and suggestions in the development of
this Essay. Thanks,  as  well, to Taylor Nchako   and  the editors of
Northwestern  University Law Review Online for their close reading and
excellent editorial recommendations. Finally, eternal thanks to my husband,
Roy Peters, who has been my steadfast rock throughout this lengthy process.


1