About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



281 Managing Intell. Prop. 43 (2019)
Alexa, What's the Impact of AI on Trademark Law

handle is hein.journals/manintpr281 and id is 45 raw text is: 


















   Alexa, 'what's the impact



   of Al on trademark law?'





While the theory around artificial intelligence generates a lot of interest,

   particu  larly  for  trademark specia ists, it's tirme to assess the potential

 practical impact on the law, say Lee Curtis and Rachel Platts of HGF












                                       hen   you ask Alexa, Amazons artificial intel-
                                         ligence (Al) assistant, how'she' works, she
                                         says: Lots of people have worked hard to
                                         teach me, and I am still learning more. She
                                         does not deviate from that response, and
                                         although Alexa does not give much away, The impact of artificial intelligence (Al)
                         the way in which Alexa - and indeed all Al assistants - works  on trademark law is as yet, untested,
                         will have a practical impact on how trademark law will work in  but here the authors provide a practi-
                         the future.                                            cal insight into some of the possibili-
                                                                                ties of the effect in practice that this
                         In our previous Managing IP article on the topic of Al and  technology could create. With the rise
                         trademarks (in December 2017), we raised - probably for the  of voice searching and Purchasing,
                         first time in print - the possible impact Al may have on some  there will be an increased importance
                         ofthe core concepts oftrademark law Notably, how willAl im-  on the phonetic aspects of trademarks,
                         pact the fundamental and accepted concepts oftrademark law  and the responsibility of accurate
                         such as average consumer', 'imperfect recollection, 'likelihood  searching could be pushed back to the
                         ofconfusion, concepts ofaural, conceptual and visual compar-  consumer. The authors suggest that
                         ison and the 'slurring' of trademarks? The ultimate question  we will see a shift in the law regarding
                         was, 'can Al be confused?'                             the liability of Al and a new legal test
                                                                                for infringement as we see a need to
                         As we explored previously, trademark law today is still funda-  identify who (or what) is making the
                         mentally based on nineteenth century concepts of how prod-  purchasing decision.
                         ucts are purchased, but when Al is involved it means that the
                         purchasing of products and services moves from a reactive to
                         predictive mode. As such, many of the current concepts of
                         trademark law may simply not be relevant anymore and the law
                         will have to adapt, as to a degree it has always done, to be flexible
                         to the new ways products are purchased.


MANAGINGIP.COM MAY/JUNE 2019  43