About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



42 Loy. L. A. L. Rev. 1021 (2008-2009)
Legal Services for All: Is the Profession Ready

handle is hein.journals/lla42 and id is 1043 raw text is: LEGAL SERVICES FOR ALL:
IS THE PROFESSION READY?
Jeanne Charn*
For decades, the organized bar has been an unwavering supporter of
expanded access to legal assistance for everyone the market cannot
serve. The bar shares a fundamental agreement with legal aid
providers that only a massive infusion of resources, complemented by
an army of pro bono attorneys can solve the access to justice problem
in the United States. This two-pronged agenda has not succeeded. The
United States continues to rank last among peer nations in access to
legal advice and assistance. However, there have been substantial
changes in the legal services landscape that point to a more complex
and challenging agenda. Resources alone will not solve the access
problem. Normative, structural, and institutional changes will be
needed to produce a more robust, efficient, and generous delivery
system in every state. These reforms will pose substantial challenges
for all sectors of the bench and bar, but particularly for the lower trial
courts, solo and small-firm practitioners, and attorneys in the staffed
legal aid offices who have been at the core of the delivery system in the
United States. If the legal profession is willing to grapple with these
challenges, reinterpreting and in some instances reformulating both its
ideals and its practices, the U.S. legal system may finally be able to
assure access for all.
I. LEGAL SERVICES AND THE ORGANIZED BAR
For nearly a half century, the American Bar Association
(ABA) has been steadfast in its support of the federal legal
services program for the poor and vigilant in its protection of legal
aid lawyers' ability to represent their clients free from funder or
board interference in individual cases.1 Bar activism played a critical
Senior Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School, Director of the Bellow-Sacks Access to
Civil Legal Services Project.
1. In the early years of the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) Legal Services
Program, the ABA carefully, but clearly, situated the new program securely within the bar's
ethical structure through a series of formal and informal ethical opinions. See ABA Comm. on
Ethics and Prof 1 Responsibility, Formal Op. 334 (1974); ABA Comm. on Ethics and Prof I
Responsibility, Formal Op. 324 (1970); ABA Comm. on Ethics and ProfI Responsibility,

1021