About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



93 B.U. L. Rev. 163 (2013)
Taking Aim at Felony Possession

handle is hein.journals/bulr93 and id is 169 raw text is: NOTES
TAKING AIM AT FELONY POSSESSION
Alexander C. Barrett*
INTRODUCTION            ............................................. .....1 64
I. RECOGNITION OF AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT AND ITS LIMITATIONS......... 169
A. Heller: A Mixture of Clarification and Uncertainty.................... 169
1. The Right Recognized      ...................       ....... 169
2. The Limitations Endorsed     .................       ...... 170
3. The Confusing Standard of Scrutiny (or Lack
Thereof)...........................             ........ 173
B. McDonald: Extension and Affirmation.........   .................. 174
1. Application to the States....................   .......... 174
2. Reaffirmation of the Heller Limitations ........    ...... 175
II. COURTS OF APPEALS' TREATMENT OF FIREARM REGULATIONS......... 176
A. The Lower Courts Grasp for an Appropriate Standard of
Scrutiny      .............................................. 177
B. Preserving the Possibility ofAs-Applied Challenges.................. 181
C. Premature Foreclosure ofAs-Applied Challenges...................... 183
III. WHY REASONED CONSIDERATION OF CHALLENGES TO SECTION
922(G)(1) IS NEEDED IN THE LOWER COURTS        .................... 185
A. Impediment to the Future Development ofSecond
Amendment Jurisprudence       .......................  ..... 185
B. Conceivably Any Conviction Can Result in Forfeiture of
Second Amendment Rights...............          .....  ........ 186
C. Second Amendment Questions Are Likely To Percolate in
the Lower Courts for Some Time............      ............. 190
IV. THERE REMAINS ROOM TO CONSIDER AS-APPLIED CHALLENGES
BROUGHT BY NONVIOLENT FELONS.......................... 192
A. The Impact ofHeller                    ........................ ............ 192
B. The Importance of History..........   ........  .......... 194
C. The Strength ofMeans-Ends Justifications .........     .......... 196
CONCLUSION................................................        ..... 198
* J.D. Candidate, Boston University School of Law, 2013; B.A. History, University of
Missouri - Kansas City. Many thanks to Katherine Mojena for her excellent editing and
advice; to Doug Bonney for sparking my interest in this topic; and to my parents, Robert
and Lee Ann Barrett, for their unflagging support of all my endeavors.
163