About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


42 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 83 (2021-2022)
Tinkering with the Schoolhouse Gate: The Future of Student Speech after Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.

handle is hein.journals/laent42 and id is 99 raw text is: TINKERING WITH THE SCHOOLHOUSE GATE: THE FUTURE OF STUDENT SPEECH AFTER MAHANOY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT V. B.L. Victoria Bonds* When the Supreme Court last created a rule about students' First Amendment rights, MySpace was the most popular social media platform. Students' use of social media and technology has radically changed since then, and it is time the First Amendment case law reflects that. With the transition to online learning after the COVID-19 pandemic and overall in- creased reliance on technology, students need clear answers about when school officials can punish them for their social media posts. The Supreme Court had a chance to clarify First Amendment student speech law this year in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L., but instead, left it up to the lower courts to decide when school officials can punish stu- dents for their off-campus speech. However, the current circuit courts' tests are unclear and heavily favor school officials. This Essay argues that the lower courts should instead adopt a test where school officials cannot punish students for their off-campus speech unless it falls within an exception to the First Amendment. * J.D. Candidate, 2022, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. The author wishes to thank her faculty advisor, Gary Williams, Professor of Law at LMU Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, for his valuable insight and feedback. The author would also like to thank her mother, Irene Ornelas, part- ner, Ryan Ellis, friend Linsey Susolik, and dog, Koa for their love and support. Finally, she would like to thank the Loyola Entertainment Law Review staffers and editors for their hard work. 83