About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



23 Drake J. Agric. L. 21 (2018)
GMO Labeling: An Emerging Food Labeling Issue

handle is hein.journals/dragl23 and id is 31 raw text is: 





GMO LABELING: AN EMERGING FOOD LABELING
                                   ISSUE


                      Marne Coit & Kim Bousquetf

I. Introduction  ..................................................................................................   2 1
II. State  L aw s .................................................................................................   22
III. Federal L aw   ..............................................................................................   24
IV . C onclusion  ................................................................................................   28


                               I. INTRODUCTION
      In July of 2016, the National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard was
signed into law.1 This law is significant in that it marks the first national standard
for labeling bioengineered foods.2 Prior to its passage, a few individual states had
legislation regulating in this area,3 but the federal genetically modified organism
(GMO) labeling law expressly preempted these state laws.4 The goal of this Essay
is to provide information on the mechanics of the Standard, which is important for
food, packaging, and agribusiness clients, as this will directly impact their labeling
of such products.





     t Marne Coit, MSEL, JD, LLM, is an Agricultural Law Lecturer at North Carolina
State University where she teaches food and agricultural law. She received her MSEL and JD
from Vermont Law School and her LLM in Food and Agricultural Law from the University of
Arkansas School of Law. Her research focus is the intersection of law and policy on food sys-
tems. Kim Bousquet is a partner at the law firm Thompson Coburn LLP in St. Louis, Mis-
souri. Kim is a passionate advocate for food, beverage, and agriculture clients in high-stakes
business disputes. She routinely handles litigation and pre-litigation disputes for companies in
the agriculture, agribusiness, biotechnology, food, and manufacturing industries.
     1. 7 U.S.C. § 1639b (Supp. IV 2017).
     2. Chris Prentice, U.S. GMO Food Labeling Bill Passes Senate, REUTERS (July 7, 2016,
10:09 PM), https://perma.cc/Y728-NDNL.
     3. Those states with bioengineered food laws were Connecticut, Maine, and Vermont.
See CONN. GEN. STAT. § 21a-92c(a) (2013), repealed by 7 U.S.C. § 1639b (Supp. IV 2017);
22 ME. REv. STAT. ANN. tit. 22, § 2593 (2014), repealed by 7 U.S.C. § 1639b (Supp. IV
2017); VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 9, §§ 3041-3048 (2014), repealed by 7 U.S.C. § 1639b (Supp. IV
2017). Alaska also required labeling of genetically engineered fish, but is not discussed in this
Essay. See Mattie Quinn, Federal GMO Labeling Bill Would Trump State Laws, GOVERNING
(Mar. 10, 2016), https://perma.cc/9DK4-SMVX.
     4. 7 U.S.C. § 1639b(e) (Supp. IV 2017).