About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



53 UC Davis L. Rev. 2655 (2019-2020)
Copyright Infringement in AI-Generated Artworks

handle is hein.journals/davlr53 and id is 2676 raw text is: 












                            NOTE


            Copyright Infringement

          in   Al-Generated Artworks


                         Jessica L. Gillotte*

                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION  .................... 2657
   1. INTERACTIONS  BETWEEN  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND
      COPYRIGHT  LAW  ...................................... 2659
      A.  Overview of AI, Machine Learning, and Artificial Neural
          Networks    .....................................  2660
      B.  Aspects of Copyright Law Relevant to Al-Generated
          Works....................................... 2665
          1.  Copyrightable Subject Matter    .................. 2666
          2.  Ownership of the Copyright     .................. 2666
  II. THE LEGAL  STATUS OF Al-GENERATED  WORKS  REMAINS
      UNCERTAIN           ........................................... 2669
      A.  Creating Intermediate Reproductions Is Not a Non-
          Infringing Operational Use of Copyrighted Works........ 2672
      B.  There Is Uncertainty as to Whether Intermediate
          Reproductions in CNNs and the GAN's Discriminative
          Model Constitute Copies Under Copyright Law ............... 2673
          1.  Seventh, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits: Mere
              Downloading  of an Unauthorized Reproduction
              onto a Computer Creates an Infringing Copy ......... 2674



     Copyright @ 2020 Jessica L. Gillotte. J.D., 2020, University of California, Davis,
School of Law; B.A., 2014, University of California, Berkeley. I am deeply grateful to
Professors Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt, William S. Dodge, and Menesh S. Patel for their
advice, guidance, and encouragement during the process of writing this Note. Thank
you to Dillon Jackson for his thoughtful comments and fantastic editing, to the editors
and members of the UC Davis Law Review for their tireless work, and to Sue Jones for
her brilliance. Thank you also to my parents and sister for their unending support.


2655