About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



67 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 115 (2009)
Overhauling the Ontario Human Rights System: Recent Developments in Case Law and Legislative Reform

handle is hein.journals/utflr67 and id is 109 raw text is: OVERHAULING THE ONTARIO HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM: RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS IN CASE LAW AND LEGISLATIVE REFORM*
TIFFANY TSUN**
I   INTRODUCTION                                                 118
II  OVERVIEW OF ONTARIO'S HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM                    119
Origins of Human Rights in Ontario                               119
Ontario's Human Rights System Prior to the Recent Reforms       120
III PROBLEMS AFFECTING EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CODE         121
Limited Accessibility of the Human Rights System                 122
Inability to Address Systemic Discrimination                     124
IV ONTARIO'S HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM AFTER LEGISLATIVE
REFORM AND TRANCHEMONTAGNE                                   125
Legislative Overhaul of Ontario's Human Rights System            125
Tranchemontagne: Multiple Forums for Raising Human Rights Concern  126
V   ASSESSMENT OF THE NEW HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM IN ONTARIO         128
Inadequate Funding Resulting in Limited Access to Tribunal       128
The System's Vulnerability to Respondents' Abuse                 130
Privatization of the Human Rights System                       131
VI CONCLUDING REMARKS: THE NEXT STEPS TO MAINTAINING AN
EFFECTIVE AND ACCESSIBLE HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM                 132

The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Senior Board Notes, Comments and
Reviews Editors, in particular Lead Researcher Andrew Martin, and the Senior Editors of the
University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review. The author is grateful to Raj Anand at
WeirFoulds LLP for inspiration for this note. The author would also like to thank her parents,
sister and brother-in-law, and Leslie Loh, for their support and encouragement.
B.E.S. (Hon.) (Waterloo), Third Year J.D. Candidate (Toronto).

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW REVIEW

VOL. 67 (1)

115