About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


85 Foreign Aff. 139 (2006)
Transformational Leadership and U.S. Grand Strategy

handle is hein.journals/fora85 and id is 721 raw text is: Transformational Leadership and U.S. Grand Strategy 3osepb S. Nye, 7r. MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE? GEORGE W. BUSH likes to boast that he does not play small ball. The Economist describes him as obsessed by the idea of being a'trans- formational' president: not just a status-quo operator like Bill Clinton but a man who changes the direction of history. But will he become that man? Bush's bid for a legacy of transformation rests on the three major changes he made to U.S. grand strategy after the terrorist attacks of September 1i, 2ooi: reducing Washington's reliance on permanent alliances and international institutions, expanding the traditional right of preemption into a new doctrine of preventive war, and advocating coercive democratization as a solution to Middle Eastern terrorism. Those changes, codified in the 2002 National Security Strategy, were widely understood as revolutionary at the time. The British journalist Philip Stephens, for example, wrote in March 2003 that he felt as if he were present at the destruction of the international order the Truman administration had created half a century earlier. Transformation in this regard is more than ordinary adaptation; it implies a major alteration of U.S. grand strategy. Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq and the failure to find either weapons of mass destruc- tion (WMD) or evidence of a connection between Saddam Hussein and 9/n, two of the three pillars of Bush's effort at transformation JOSEPH S. NYE, JR., is Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard University. His most recent books are Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics and The Power Game: A Washington Novel. [139]