About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



21 J. Common Mkt. Stud. 57 (1982-1983)
Europe as a Confederation: The Community and the Nation-State

handle is hein.journals/jcmks21 and id is 56 raw text is: 





      Europe as a Confederation: the

    Community and the Nation-State

                           WILLIAM WALLACE


The  collapse of integration theory does not necessarily carry with it the
collapse of European integration. In spite of oil crises, economic recession,
and political instability, the European Community remains a functioning
political system. Certainly, it does not function well; but few political
systems have functioned well under the difficult circumstances of the 1970s,
even those equipped  with a full range of policies and a strong central
administration. Certainly, too, it has disappointed the hopes of the more
idealistic of its founders, and failed to achieve the most ambitious of its
objectives. But - as will be argued below - those hopes were founded upon
two  linked illusions: that politics could be tamed within the European
enterprise, and that national governments would allow themselves to be
bypassed and undermined.  Grand and  rhetorical objectives are the stuff of
summit  conferences, as they  are in the USA   of inaugural  speeches;
intended to lift the imagination and to provide a sense of movement and
direction, without necessarily committing their authors to reach their
ultimate destination.
  European  cooperation is a profoundly political process, best understood
in the familiar terms of political analysis, not in the arcane language of
functionalism or the loose concepts of regime theory. It is not only today's
reality that is complex and messy;' the realities of politics were always
so. In heroic times, perhaps, men created new federations out of a clear
sense of purpose, supported by a public which shared that purpose. The
myth  of the making of the American  constitution, in its popular form,
portrays the founding fathers as men of wisdom and vision, their opponents
as scattered and obscurantist. Closer examination of the record demons-
trates that Patrick Henry and  Richard  Henry  Lee were  defending as
honourable a mixture of ideals and interests as that promoted by Hamilton
and  Madison.  The  mythology  of  European  integration has similarly
endowed  the statesmen of the 1950s and the electorates they led with a
vision and a purpose which  their successors are sadly seen to lack. The

' Stanley Hoffimann, Reflections on the nation-state in Western Europe today, see above.