About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



20 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 85 (2012-2013)
Lonely Colonist Seeks Wife: The Forgotten History of America's First Mail Order Brides

handle is hein.journals/djglp20 and id is 89 raw text is: 









Lonely Colonist Seeks Wife: The Forgotten History of America's
                           First Mail   Order   Brides

                                  MARCIA   ZUG*

     As  Catherine looks out across the water, she wonders what her life will be like when
she reaches Virginia. She knows that conditions will be hard, but life in England was also
hard.  At  least in the colony, there is the possibility of improvement. The Virginia
Company   has assured her and  the other women   that they will have their choice of
marriage partners.  They have promised  that the men are wealthy, or at least will be
wealthy with the women's help. Moreover, in Virginia, as a married woman she has the
right to share in her husband's wealth. Catherine knows it is a risk, but she has been
assured she can always  return home if she changes her mind.  Regardless, Catherine
expects to stay. There is littlefor her back in England. She will marry a colonist and help
found a nation.

     The  first American   mail  order brides  were  independent,   powerful  and
respected; they are never described  as mail order brides. The term mail  order
bride  is most often reserved  for women   perceived  as victims.' Colonial  mail
order  brides,  by  contrast, have  other  names:  Jamestown brides, King's
daughters,  and  Casket girls. Nonetheless, the label mail order bride is just
as appropriate.  Sources describing  colonial mail order brides  demonstrate  that
these  women   immigrated   to America   for many   of the same   reasons as  their
modem counterparts, but the colonial mail order brides received a level of
respect  and acceptance  that typically eludes  contemporary   mail order  brides.2
Distancing  today's mail order brides from  these lauded forbearers obscures  their
similarities and perpetuates the one-dimensional  treatment  of modem   mail order
brides.3  Re-examining  the feminist underpinnings   of the first mail order brides


* Associate Professor of Law at The University of South Carolina School of Law. I would like to
thank Mark Graber, Martha Ertman, David Schleicher, Robin Wilson, Jana Singer, and Michael
Greenberger for their helpful suggestions and insights with this piece.
    1. See, e.g., Christine Chun, The Mail-Order Bride Industry: The Perpetuation of Transnational
Economic Inequalities and Stereotypes, 17 U. PA. J. INT'L ECON. L. 1155 (1996); Donna Lee, Mail Fantasy:
Global Sexual Exploitation in the Mail Order Bride Industry and Proposed Legal Solutions, 5 ASIAN L.J. 139,
139 (1998); Eddy Meng, Mail-Order Brides: Gilded Prostitution and the Legal Response, 28 U. MICH. J. oF L.
REF. 197, 197 (1994); Vanessa Vergara, Abusive Mail Order Bride Marriage and the Thirteenth Amendment,
94 Nw. U. L. REV. 1547, 1547 (2000).
    2. See Daniel Epstein, Romance is Dead: Mail Order Brides as Surrogate Corpses, 17 BUFF. J.GENDER
 L. & Soc. POL'Y 61, 66 (2009) (likening mail order marriages to necrophilia).
    3. See, e.g., Chun, supra note 1, at 1156 (contrasting the original mail order brides who Chun
describes as a necessity based on specific historical and cultural conditions with the modern mail-