About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



66 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1581 (1992-1993)
Traces of the Master Narrative in the Story of African American/Korean American Conflict: How We Constructed Los Angeles

handle is hein.journals/scal66 and id is 1597 raw text is: TRACES OF THE MASTER
NARRATIVE IN THE STORY OF
AFRICAN AMERICAN/KOREAN
AMERICAN CONFLICT: HOW
WE CONSTRUCTED LOS ANGELES
LISA C. IKEMOTO*
I. INTRODUCTION
Many who have written about Los Angeles see the dynamics of race
in the terrible events that took place on April 29 to May 1, 1992. Some
blamed Black racism for what happened; others found fault with the
behavior of Korean merchants. Others, more perceptively, blamed our
society's system of white-over-colored supremacy for pitting the two out-
sider groups against one another, setting the stage for the conflict that
exploded on those fateful days. I agree with this latter position, but my
aim in this Essay is slightly different. It is to explore how we analyzed,
explained, came to understand, and gave meaning to Los Angeles.
How and why did we construct the story of that conflict as we did?
II. CONSTRUCTED CONFLICT
During the early aftermath of the civil disorder in Los Angeles, the
notion of Korean American/African American conflict emerged as a
focal point in explanations for Los Angeles. Examination of this con-
struct reveals that Korean Americans, African Americans, and those
apparently outside the conflict used concepts of race, identity, and
entitlement in ways that described conflict as inevitable. Further interro-
gation suggests that despite the absence of obvious whiteness in a conflict
* Associate Professor, Indiana University School of Law (Indianapolis). B.A. 1984, Univer-
sity of California (Los Angeles); J.D. 1987, University of California (Davis); L.L.M. 1989, Columbia
University. I am very thankful to Richard Delgado and Neil Gotanda for their comments. Addi-
tional thanks to Karen Kiyo Alman, Luke Cole, Jayne Lee, and Dean Toji.

1581