About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



11 Lentera Hukum 24 (2024)
Paradigm Shift of Death Penalty Regulation in the New Criminal Code (KUHP) of Indonesia

handle is hein.journals/lenth11 and id is 27 raw text is: 


Lentera Hukum, 11:1 (2024), pp. 24-55                  Available online 30 April 2024
ISSN 2355-4673 (Print) 2621-3710 (Online)              https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v10i1.45809






Paradigm Shift of Death Penalty Regulation in the New

Criminal Code (KUHP) of Indonesia




M. Arief Amrullah  *
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Indonesia


ABSTRACT: The arrangement of death penalty in the new Criminal Code (KUH P) raises two different
views between those who defend and reject death penalty. In this regard, this paper aims to find the
reasoning for the retention of death penalty in the new Criminal Code, which was passed in 2022. This
paper will also discuss what has caused the shift of death penalty allocation, from its position as a
main to an alternative punishment with ten years' probation period. The death penalty regulation in
the Dutch Criminal Code is no longer in accordance with the development of punishment, so it
requires a renewal. In the new KU H P, death penalty is the last resort and is imposed alternatively with
a ten-year probation period. If the convict shows a good and commendable attitude during the
imprisonment, then the death penalty can be changed into life imprisonment or imprisonment for a
maximum   of twenty years. The arrangement of a ten-year probation period is a middle way to
accommodate  views that reject and support the death penalty, which demonstrates the essence of
shifting the allocation of death penalty to an alternative punishment in Indonesia.
KEYWORDS:   Paradigm shift, Criminal Punishment, Death Penalty, Legal Reasoning, Indonesia.





                             I. INTRODUCTION

The  effort to realize a New   Criminal  Code   in Indonesia  has  come  a long  way,

as the Draft  Criminal  Code   (RKUHP) was postponed several times from 1999
to 2022.   One  reason  is the  criticism from   various  circles in the community
regarding  fourteen  problematic   articles, including the formulation  of  the death

penalty. In recognition  of these criticisms, President Joko  Widodo   requested   for
the Ministry  of Law  and  Human Rights to review the RKUHP.1 The enactment

of the  death penalty  raises various  responses  and  views  from  the  community;



    Ihsanuddin & Krisiandi, Jokowi Sebut Ada 14 Pasal Bermasalah di RKUHP, KOMPAS.com
    (20                    September                    2019),                   online:
    <https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/09/20 /15411811 /jokowi-sebut-ada-14-pasal-
    bermasalah-di-rkuhp>.


* Corresponding author, email: arief.fh@unej.ac.id
Submitted: 20 January 2024 I Reviewed: 11 March 2024 1 Revised: 12 March 2024 | Accepted: 23 March 2024

Published by the University of Jember (Indonesia). © The Author(s), 2024. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (htto: / /creativecommons.org/licenses/bv-sa/4.0).