About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



39 UCLA L. Rev. 1703 (1991-1992)
Bank Director Liability under FIRREA: A New Defense for Directors and Officers of Insolvent Depository Institutions - or a Tighter Noose

handle is hein.journals/uclalr39 and id is 1717 raw text is: COMMENTS
BANK DIRECTOR LIABILITY UNDER
FIRREA: A NEW DEFENSE FOR DIRECTORS
AND OFFICERS OF INSOLVENT
DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS-OR A
TIGHTER NOOSE?
David B. Fischer*
INTRODUCTION
By the autumn of 1991, America's thrift and commercial bank-
ing industries' were deeply mired in a severe crisis reminiscent of
* Third year student, UCLA School of Law, Chief Article Editor, UCLA Law
Review, volume 40. I am indebted to David D. Stitz, an Encino attorney, and to Prof.
Steven Freeman, of counsel to Mr. Stitz, for having suggested this topic to me during
the summer that I clerked for them. As a matter of formal disclosure, during that
period they defended an officer who was being sued by the FDIC, and I participated in
researching aspects of that defense. However, my research of this particular topic was
conducted independently, and I drew my own conclusions. I also acknowledge the co-
operation of James R. Holbrook, a Salt Lake City attorney who participated in the
Canfield defense team. Having already formulated my conclusions before communicat-
ing with Mr. Holbrook, I subsequently sought his assistance in obtaining public court
documents that had been filed by the FDIC and by the Canfield defense team respec-
tively. Prof. William A. Klein of UCLA School of Law served as my academic advisor
for this project and made many important and substantial suggestions for which I am
deeply grateful. Prof. Richard Abel introduced me to the interrelationship of legal
scholarship and sociology. My wife, Prof. Linda Yellin of California State University at
Northridge and of Pierce College, reviewed my sociological research and offered valua-
ble suggestions. Joe Ryan, Genie Gifford, Jeanne Dennis, Gary Gleb and Sonny
Kahng, my editors, made important recommendations that significantly improved the
text's clarity and cohesion. Finally, I thank my daughters Yael, Kineret and Ayelet-
who simply left me alone for two months.
This Comment is dedicated to Prof. Christine A. Littleton of the UCLA School of
Law. It does not necessarily reflect her views.
1. For a discussion regarding the historic differences between thrifts and commer-
cial banks, see C. GOLEMBE & D. HOLLAND, FEDERAL REGULATION OF BANKING,
1986-87, at 15-23 (1986); E. SYMONS, JR. & J. WHITE, BANKING LAW 49-57 (1991).

1703