About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


9 AGORA Int'l J. Jurid. Sci. 68 (2015)
Executive Powers in Relations with the Parliament: Part I

handle is hein.journals/agoraijjs2015 and id is 276 raw text is: AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, http://univagoraro/jour/indexyhp/aijjs ISSN 1843-570X, E-ISSN 2067-7677 No. 4 (2015), pp. 68-76 EXECUTIVE POWERS IN RELATIONS WITH THE PARLIAMENT. PART I 0. SARAMET Oana $aramet Faculty of Law, Department of Law Transilvania University of Bragov, Bragov, Romania *Correspondence: Oana $aramet, Transilvania University of Bragov, Eroilor Boulevard no.25, Bragov, Rominia E-mail: oana saramet 2005@yahoo.com Abstract: By art. 1 para. (4), Romanian Constitution, republished, enshrined the principle of separation and balance of powers. Therefore, this principle implies the existence of collaboration but also of a mutual control between these powers, including between the legislative and executive power, thus being expressed the balance between these two powers. By constitutional established powers, the two central authorities of the executive power - the President of Romania and the Government - will participate at the observance and application of this principle, including by those duties they perform in their relations with the legislative power. Keywords: head of state, legislative power, convening, dissolution, messages, promulgation Introduction Based on the constitutional provisions in force, we can identify two functions of the Romanian executive, namely the executive one and the administrative one. In our view, the determination of the powers which enable fulfilling these functions it is possible by reporting to the executive structures and, therefore, the specific functions of each of them. Motivation of this allegation is that the powers enshrined in the constitution and laws in the task of these structures, in fact represents their competence, namely of the head of state - the president or monarch, and of the government. So we appreciate as difficult, if not impossible, to talk about the competence of the executive as stand-alone entity, more so as most contemporary constitutional systems have established a dualist executive and not a monocratic one. 68