About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



69 Fla. L. Rev. 1251 (2017)
Revenge Porn Reform: A View from the Front Lines

handle is hein.journals/uflr69 and id is 1289 raw text is: 



REVENGE PORN REFORM: A VIEW FROM THE FRONT LINES

                          Mary Anne  Franks'

                               Abstract
   The  legal and  social landscape  of revenge  porn  has  changed
dramatically  in the last few  years. Before  2013,  only three  states
criminalized the unauthorized disclosure of sexually explicit images of
adults and few people had ever heard the ternm revenge porn. As of July
2017,  thirty-eight states and Washington, D.C.  had  criminalized the
conduct; federal criminal legislation on the issue had been introduced in
Congress;  Google,  Facebook, and  Twitter had  banned  nonconsensual
pornography  from their platforms; and the term revenge porn had been
added  to the Merriam- Webster Dictionary. I have had  the privilege of
playing a role in many  of these developments.  In 2013, I argued that
nonconsensual  pornography   required a federal criminal response  and
drafted a model statute to this effect. That statute served as the template
for what eventually became  the federal Intimate Privacy Protection Act
of 2016, as well as for numerous state laws criminalizing nonconsensual
pornography.  As the Legislative and Tech Policy Director of the Cyber
Civil  Rights Initiative, I have worked   with  tech industry  leaders,
legislators, attorneys, victims, and advocates to develop policies and
solutions to combat this abuse. This Article is an account from the front
lines of the legislative, technological, and social reform regarding this
evolving problem.

INTRODUCTION:   LADY  GODIVA'S   RIDE................     ............ 1252

     1.  THE REVENGE   PORN  REFORMATION       ....................1 257
         A.  Defining the Problem         .......................1 257
             1.   Scope and Impact ............................  1261
             2.  Case  Studies ...................           ....... 1264
                 a.   Rehtaeh Parsons    ...............   .....1 265
                 b.   Judge Lori Douglas   ...........    ........ 1265
                 c.   Audrie Pott ........................ 1266
                 d.   Dr. Holly Jacobs    ................     .... 1267
         B.  Tech Developments..............          ............. 1270
         C.  Victim Support and Outreach  Developments  ............... 1277
         D.  Legal Developments     .............................. 1278

     * Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law. I am gratcful to Christopher
Bracey, Mary Anne Case, Daniclle Citron, Carrie Goldberg, Holly Jacobs, Orin Kerr. Andrew
Koppelman, Ira C. Lupu, Richard McAdams, Eric Posner, Naomi Schoenbaum, Congresswoman
Jackie Speicr, Lior Strahilivetz, JoAnne Sweeny, Jason Walta, participants in the University of
Chicago Family, Sex, and Gender Workshop, and participants in the George Washington
University Law School Work in Progress Series. Thank you to IEmily Cabrera for research
assistance.


1251