About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



43 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1283 (2013)
Combating Gang-Perpetuated Witness Intimidation with Forfeiture by Wrongdoing

handle is hein.journals/shlr43 and id is 1327 raw text is: COMBATING GANG-PERPETRATED WITNESS INTIMIDATION
WITH FORFEITuRE BY WRONGDOING
By: Katie M. McDonough*
[Tihe Constitution does not guarantee an accused person against the
legitimate consequences of his own wrongful acts.'
INTRODUCTION
Gangs are an extreme threat to the communities in which they
operate and to the criminal justice system. Central to gang culture is
strong loyalty among gang members coupled with no snitching
policies enforced through intimidation and retaliation. Witnesses to
crime, gang members who have knowledge of misdeeds, and even
entire  neighborhoods are     fearful about cooperating with law
enforcement in gang-controlled communities.4 The risk nin by
cooperating with law enforcement is real: many witnesses are attacked
or killed, and residents in gang-controlled communities who report
crimes to law enforcement face the prospect of retaliatory crimes
against their person, property, and family members.' Criminal gangs
benefit from enforcing no snitching policies with intimidation and
retribution.  Successful witness intimidation or murder renders a
witness unavailable, which means that the witness's information is
likely to be inadmissible in court. This often forces prosecutors to
delay trial, reduce charges, or drop cases altogether, bringing the
wheels of justice to a grinding halt. The common law doctrine of
* Katie M. McDonough, J.D., 2013, Seton Hall University School of Law; B.A.,
2008, College of the Holy Cross. With gratitude to my advisor, Professor D. Michael
Risinger, for his encouragement; debts owed to the editors of the Seton Hall Law
Review for their talent; and appreciation to my husband, Michael G. McDonough,
for his support.
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 158 (1878).
See Part I infra.
3  Id.
4  Id.
Id.
6  Id.
7 FED. R. EVID. 802 (restyled).
8 See infra note 100 and accompanying text.

1283