About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



21 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1051 (2018-2019)
Immigration to Blue Cities in Red States: The Battleground between Sanctuary and Exclusion

handle is hein.journals/upjcl21 and id is 1063 raw text is: 











            IMMIGRATION TO BLUE CITIES IN RED STATES: THE
         BATTLEGROUND BETWEEN SANCTUARY AND EXCLUSION




                                  Karla  Mari   McKanders*


                                         ABSTRACT

    An  ongoing intrastate immigration regulation battle between cities, municipalities, and states with the Trump
    Administration intervening with litigation and executive orders has dominated the immigration federalism
    landscape. Some state, cities, and localities have passed sanctuary laws and policies seeking to protect immigrant
    communities by not inquiring into an individual's immgration status, while other states have begun to pass
    exclusionary anti-sanctuary laws, sanctioning non-compliance with federal immigration laws.

    The  Trump Administration's policies, along weith the resulting litigation, place immigration federalism in an
    unprecedented context. This Symposium Article interrogates the concept of immigration federalism examining the
    political and ideological contours of state and local exclusionay and sanctuary laws highlighting new issues that
    have surfaced under the TrumpAdministration'spolicies. This Article utilizes the red state and blue city intrastate
    federalism conflicts within the State of Tennessee to highlight the political dynamics that govern the passing of
    state and local exclusionan and sanctuar laws. The new landscape of exclusionary and sanctuay laws has
    increasingly emphasized a red state and blue city political divide. In this context, thic Article argues that recent
    immigration federalism standoffs center around political divisions which fail to engage in principled evaluations
    of which level of government federal state, or local- should be the locus of immigration regulation.


                                  TABLE OF CONTENTS


INTRODUCTION                                        ............................................... 1052


I. IMMIGRATION FEDERALISM AND THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.. 1054


II. BLUE CITY RESISTANCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION AND RED STATE
         POLICIES................................................ 1056
         A.  Sanctuary  as a Form   ofResistance       ...................         ...... 1056
         B.  State and  Local Intrastate Immigration   Federalism   Battles................. 1057


III. COURT BATTLES AND IMPLICATIONS OF CONTINUED SUB-FEDERAL
         REGULATION............................................ 1063


CONCLUSION                     ..............................................        ..... 1069


1051


*    Clinical Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School. Special thanks to my research
     assistants Rachel M. Stuckey, Sadie Shourd, andJoshua D. Minchin.