About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



35 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 705 (2001-2002)
Corporate Social Responsibility in an Era of Economic Globalization

handle is hein.journals/davlr35 and id is 719 raw text is: Corporate Social Responsibility in an
Era of Economic Globalization
Cynthia A. Williams
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IN TRO D U CTIO N   ................................................................................................ 706
I. THE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LITERATURE .................... 711
A .  The  Predom inant  View  ................................................................. 711
B.   Competing Views on Corporate Social Responsibility ................. 715
II. AN EXAMINATION OF THE PREDOMINANT POSITION ........................ 717
A.   Brief Overview of Transnational Economic Activity in the
G lobalizing  Econom y .................................................................... 720
B.   The Corporate Social Responsibility Dilemma ............................. 721
C .  The  Lim its  of  Law   ......................................................................... 724
1. The Undermining of Sovereignty: Problems in the
Proactive Application of State Power ............................... 725
a. Relocation as a Method of Choosing the
Applicable Regulatory Structure ................................ 726
(1)  Environm   ental Law   .......................................... 727
(2)  Labor  Law    .......................................................... 731
b. The Effects of Globalization on Countries'
Motivation to Pass Protective Laws ........................... 736
I would like to thank the participants in the Davis Symposium on Corporate
Governance for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper, as well as members of the
faculty at the University of Colorado and at Fordham University Law School, where an
earlier draft was presented. I would particularly like to thank members of the faculty at
Georgetown University Law Center for their comments on an earlier draft and for their
hospitality during the academic year 2000-01. This Article was written while I was a Sloan
Fellow at Georgetown in the Sloan-Georgetown Project on Business Institutions during
2000-01, and so I warmly acknowledge the financial support of the Sloan Foundation as
well.