About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



67 DePaul L. Rev. 705 (2017-2018)
Something More: Official Action after McDonnell v. United States

handle is hein.journals/deplr67 and id is 731 raw text is: 





     SOMETHING MORE: OFFICIAL ACTION AFTER
               McDONNELL v. UNITED STATES

                           Matthew  T. Ciulla*


                             INTRODUCTION
   Public corruption cases  often feature tawdry  tales of government
officials receiving lavish gifts, over-the-top luxury vacations, and even
cash in exchange  for conveying  a perceived  official benefit to the gift-
giver.' One  such  case, McDonnell   v. United States, featured scintillat-
ing  tales of a governor  receiving  Ferraris, Rolexes, and  ball gowns
while  hosting extravagant  parties for his benefactors.2
   No  matter how  dazzling the facts, however, the  technical aspects of
these cases  also showcase  issues with our federal criminal justice sys-
tem.  Resolving   these issues is important, as  a wide  array of public
corruption  statutes are available to federal prosecutors, but these stat-
utes have  been  narrowed  by  the judiciary on numerous   grounds.3
   McDonnell   highlighted one  such issue: the ill-defined official act
requirement   in the federal bribery statute.4 In the case, the Supreme
Court  ultimately held that a public official arranging a meeting  in ex-
change  for a thing  of value, without  more,  does  not constitute an
official act for bribery purposes.5  This  holding  alarmed  some  com-
mentators,  who  focused on  the tawdry  nature of the case.6 For exam-
ple, one  commentator   wrote  that the  Court  set a new  standard  for

  * Juris Doctor, Notre Dame Law School, 2017; Bachelor of Science, Vanderbilt University,
2014. The author thanks professor Stephen F. Smith for his insight on this Article and all things
criminal law, and the DePaul Law Review staff for their edits and hard work.
  1. See, e.g., McDonnell v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2355, 2375 (2016) (But our concern is not
with tawdry tales of Ferraris, Rolexes, and ball gowns.); Andrew Lopez, Ex-Moreno Valley
Councilman to Plead Guilty in $2.3M Bribery Case, NBC4 Los ANGELES (Nov. 5, 2013, 1:03
PM), http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Moreno-Valley-Corruption-Bribery-Councilman-
IRS-230703501.html (councilman accepting $2.3 million bribe).
  2. See, e.g., Amy Davidson Sorkin, The Supreme Court's Bribery-Blessing McDonnell Deci-
sion, NEW YORKER, Jun. 27, 2016, http://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davidson/the-supreme-
courts-bribery-blessing-mcdonnell-decision; see also McDonnell, 136 S. Ct. at 2375.
  3. See generally John S. Gawey, Note, The Hobbs Leviathan: The Dangerous Breadth of the
Hobbs Act and Other Corruption Statutes, 87 NOTRE DAME L. REv. 383, 417-18 (2011).
  4. See 18 U.S.C. § 201(a)(3) (2006) (defining official act); see generally McDonnell, 136 S.
Ct. at 2367-71.
  5. McDonnell, 136 S. Ct. at 2371-72.
  6. See, e.g., Sorkin, supra note 2; see also McDonnell, 136 S. Ct. at 2375.


705