About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



2017 U. Ill. L. Rev. 817 (2017)
Of Chimps and Men: Animal Welfare vs. Animal Rights and How Losing the Legal Battle May Win the Political War for Endangered Species

handle is hein.journals/unilllr2017 and id is 831 raw text is: 








OF  CHIMPS AND MEN: ANIMAL WELFARE VS. ANIMAL
RIGHTS AND HOW LOSING THE LEGAL BATTLE MAY WIN
THE   POLITICAL WAR FOR ENDANGERED SPECIES

                                                      BRYAN   VAYR*


       American   law has historically viewed nonhuman   animals  as
  property whose  interests are balanced against those of humans-a so-
  called welfarist view of animals. In contrast, animal-rights propo-
  nents argue that animals are legal persons entitled to a slate of rights
  regardless of the inconvenience for humans.  Animal  advocates  of
  both  stripes-dissatisfied with welfarist statutes such as the Endan-
  gered Species and Animal  Welfare Acts-have   taken their causes to
  the courthouse. After discussing the relevant history and theory, this
  Note pragmatically weighs the merits of both the welfarist and rights-
  based  approaches to cause lawyering for endangered-species protec-
  tion from both extinction and cruelty. The Note concludes that activ-
  ists' finite energies may be better spent petitioning the legislator in-
  stead of  the judge. Cause lawyers  nonetheless may  help win  the
  political debate by engaging in litigation capitulation -making the
  polity aware of current legal shortcomings by bringing juicy, sympa-
  thetic animal cases to court that are likely to suffer a high-profile, un-
  popular defeat.

                           TABLE  OF CONTENTS
1.    INTRODUCTION           .......................................... 819
II.   BACKGROUND            ..................................... ...... 821
      A.   Theoretical Foundation: Animal Welfare vs. Animal
           Rights...................................... 821
           1. Animal  Welfare       ........................  ..... 822
           2. Animal  Rights .....................            ......... 824
      B.   The Bad Old Days: A  Brief Legal History of Nonwild and
           Wild Animals in Anglo Law.............        .............. 825
       C. A  New  Hope: Addressing Fears of Cruelty and Extinction... 827
           1. Anti-Cruelty and the Animal Welfare Act .....    ...... 828
           2. Conservation and the Endangered  Species Act ................ 829


    *  J.D. Candidate, 2017, University of Illinois College of Law. I want to thank the editors and
members of the University of Illinois Law Review for their hard work and good nature throughout the
year. Most of all, I want to thank Emily Cross for patiently and graciously enduring many a dinner
conversation on this topic: I look forward to a lifetime of breaking bread and mulling over the counter-
majoritarian difficulty with you.


817