About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



39 San Diego L. Rev. 693 (2002)
How Not to End Disability

handle is hein.journals/sanlr39 and id is 703 raw text is: How Not to End Disability
JANET RADCLIFFE RICHARDS*
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.       THE ARGUMENTS     ............................................................................................... 693
II.      THE TRADITIONAL VIEW: DISABILITY AS INDIVIDUAL MISFORTUNE ................... 695
III.     THE RADICAL VIEW: DISABILITY AS SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION .............................. 697
IV .     LESSER  W ORTH  .................................................................................................. 699
V.       DISENTANGLING EQUAL WORTH ........................................................................ 701
VI.      INSTRUMENTAL VALUE AS THE CENTRAL ISSUE .................................................. 704
VII.     THE LIMrrs OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION .............................................................. 706
A.    D isabling  the Able .................................................................................... 708
B.    Abling  the  D isabled  .................................................................................. 709
V III.   A ITITrUDES ......................................................................................................... 711
IX .     CONCLUSION   ...................................................................................................... 712
I. THE ARGUMENTS
When advances in genetic technology offer the chance of preventing
or curing disease and disability, it is one thing to recommend caution on
the grounds that these obvious benefits may be outweighed by associated
harms. It is quite another to deny even that there are benefits to be
outweighed, and that attempts to prevent disability by these means
should be resisted outright. That, however, is a view that is increasingly
widespread in the disability rights movement.
*    Reader in Bioethics, University College London.