About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


64 Can. Bus. L.J. 316 (2020-2021)
Equitable Subordination Redux? Section 183 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and respecting the "Legislative Will" of Parliament

handle is hein.journals/canadbus64 and id is 338 raw text is: EQUITABLE SUBORDINATION REDUX? SECTION 183 OF THE BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT AND RESPECTING THE LEGISLATIVE WILL* OF PARLIAMENT Thomas G.W. Telfer** The Supreme Court of Canada has yet to rule on whether the American doctrine of equitable subordination is part of Canadian law. In Re U.S. Steel, the Ontario Court of Appeal suggested in obiter that s. 183 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) conferred upon courts the power to equitably subordinate a claim. This article focuses on the specific point of whether s. 183 of the BIA provides the court jurisdiction in equity to subordinate a claim and alter the statutory priority scheme. Equitable jurisdiction found in s. 183 of the BIA does not represent a broad power to reorder statutory priorities based on notions of fairness and good conscience. The s. 183 jurisprudence simply does not support the obiter statement in U.S. Steel. In interpreting s. 183, Canadian courts have relied upon traditional doctrines of equity. To allow equitable subordination under s. 183 would be an attempt to ignore the legislative will of Parliament and the BIA priority regime. There may be no need to import equitable subordination as there are existing provisions in the BIA which subordinate claims of the type often considered under the American doctrine of equitable subordination. Canadian law also effectively deals with creditor and insider misconduct through the oppression remedy and the new statutory duty of good faith. [C]ourts should not use equity to do what they wish Parliament had done through legislation. Re Indalex Ltd., 2013 SCC 6 (S.C.C.), at para. 82 (Deschamps J.) Equality is the great object and virtue of the Bankruptcy Acts. Farmers' Mart Ltd v. Milne, [1915] A.C. 106 (Eng. H.L.), at p. 115 (Lord Atkinson) * Re Residential Warranty Co. of Canada Inc., 2006 ABCA 293 (Alta. C.A.) at para. 20. ** Professor and Teaching Fellow, Faculty of Law, Western University. Research assistance provided by Stephanie Zuk, David Fanjoy, Chirine Ali and Saima Ahmad. 316