About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



29 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 499 (2014-2015)
Future War and the War Powers Resolution

handle is hein.journals/emint29 and id is 518 raw text is: 










    FUTURE WAR AND THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION

                            Eric Talbot Jensen*

                                 ABSTRACT

   Since its passage in 1973 over the veto of then-President Nixon, the War
Powers Resolution (WPR) has been laden with controversy. Labeled as
everything from ineffective to unconstitutional, the WPR has generally failed in
its design to require notification and consultation to Congress by the
President. Despite numerous proposals to amend the WPR, it continues to
languish in the twilight ofExecutive war powers, and its future is bleak.

    With emerging technologies such as drones, cyber tools, nanotechnology,
and genomics, the ineffectiveness of the WPR will prove even more profound
The WPR's reliance on armed forces and hostilities as triggers for the
reporting and consulting requirements of the statute will prove completely
inadequate to regulate the use of these advanced technologies. Rather, as the
President analyzes the applicability of the WPR to military operations using
these advancing technologies, he will determine that the WPR is not triggered
and he has no reporting requirements. Recent conflicts (or potential conflicts)
in Libya, Syria and Iraq highlight this inevitability.

   For the WPR to achieve the aim it was originally intended to accomplish,
Congress will need to amend the statute to cover emerging technologies that
do not require boots on the ground to be effective and which would not
constitute hostilities. This article proposes expanding the coverage of the
WPR from actions by armed forces to actions by armed forces personnel,
supplies or capabilities. he article also proposes expanding the coverage of
the statute to hostilities and violations of the sovereignty of other nations by
the armedforces.


   * Associate Professor, Brigham Young University Law School. The author would like to thank Ashley
Gengler, Grant Hodgson, Court Roper and Aaron Worthen who provided excellent research and review
assistance for this article.