About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



14 Seton Hall J. Dipl. & Int'l Rel. 23 (2013)
Somewhere between Great and Small: Disentangling the Conceptual Jumble of Middle, Regional, and Niche Powers

handle is hein.journals/whith14 and id is 159 raw text is: Somewhere Between Great and Small:
Disentangling the Conceptual Jumble of
Middle, Regional, and 'Niche' Powers
by David A. Cooper
'There is a burgeoning strata of pivotal states, dynamic rsing middle powers ... like9 to
play an increasingly important role in regional securip and global rule-shaping. 
'While there are some hints as to how to differentate between great powers and regional
powers, there is stll the problem of making a clear-cut dksnction between regionalpowers
and middle powers. '2
Structural schools of International Relations (IR) theory have long indulged a
benign disinterest in the intermediate spectrum of states within the power hierarchy
that comprises their most elemental conception of the international system. These
states are the score or more of supporting actors that do not rank among the few
great powers that command the starring roles on the world stage, but that
nevertheless boast sufficient national wherewithal to act as consequential regional
players or to exert some meaningful degree of global influence. This moderate
capacity to affect international affairs sets these supporting actors apart from the
much larger cast of bit players, meaning the vast majority of sovereign actors that
are too small (geographically or demographically) or too weak (militarily or
economically) to exercise any significant independent agency in shaping their
external relations. There is now every reason to suppose, however, that scholarly
interest in these intermediary actors may be on the rise. Given the widely surmised
transformation of today's quasi-hegemonic world order into a more multipolar
incarnation, it seems likely that IR scholarship-even to include the stubbornly
solipsistic American mainstream version of the discipline will need to look beyond
the United States and its handful of closest peers to discern the shape of things to
come.
While welcoming such an expansive prospect, this article suggests that a pause
is in order for some overdue categorical housecleaning. Until relatively recently most
David A. Cooper is Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Affairs at the
U.S. Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island. (All views expressed or implied are those of the
author and do not represent positions of the U.S. Naval War College or any other affiliation.)
23
The Journal of Diplomac and International Relations