About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



32 Wis. Int'l L.J. 355 (2014)
Limitations of the Customary International Principle of Non-Refoulement on Non-Party States: Thailand Repatriates the Remaining Hmong-Lao Regardless of International Norms

handle is hein.journals/wisint32 and id is 371 raw text is: 





LIMITATIONS OF THE CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL
PRINCIPLE OF NON-REFOULEMENT ON NON-PARTY
STATES: THAILAND REPATRIATES THE REMAINING
    HMONG-LAO REGARDLESS OF INTERNATIONAL
                           NORMS

                         JERRY VANG
Introduction        .................................. ......356
I.  History & Background     .................................358
      A. The Hmong         .......................... ......358
      B. The Secret War: The Hmong's Fight against
          Communism during the Vietnam War..........       ..........358
      C. United States Withdraws from Laos ........................359
      D. Hmong-Lao Seeking Asylum in Thailand .......        .....360
      E. The Closing of the Thai Refugee Camps and the Start of
          Repatriation     ........................... .....362
II. The International Legal Framework for Protecting Refugees........365
      A. The Definition of Refugee under the Refugee
          Convention       ............................ .....366
      B. Refugee Status under the United Nations High
          Commissioner for Refugees .............   .........370
      C. The Customary International Legal Principle of Non-
          Refoulement       ........................... .....371
III. Thailand Violated the Non-Refoulement Principle when It
    Repatriated Thousands of Hmong-Lao from its Border in 2009 ...373
      A. Many Hmong-Lao Satisfied the Criteria under the
          Inclusion Clause of the Refugee Definition .....   ......373
      B. Many Hmong-Lao Maintained Their Refugee Status.........376
      C. Many Hmong-Lao Did Not Voluntarily Repatriate to
          Laos   ....................... ...............378
IV. Limitations in Making Non-Party States Abide by the Non-
    Refoulement Principle ....................        ..........380
V. Conclusion          ................................. .....383



   Jerry B. Vang is an attorney at Wisconsin Judicare in Wausau, Wisconsin. His practice includes
   consumer protection law, family law, landlord-tenant law, and public housing regulations. He
   received his doctor of Jurisprudence from the University of Wisconsin Law School in May of
   2013.