About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



63 Fla. L. Rev. 395 (2011)
Student Speech and the First Amendment: A Comprehensive Approach

handle is hein.journals/uflr63 and id is 403 raw text is: STUDENT SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: A
COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
Lee Goldman*
INTRODUCTION..........................................396
I. CASE BACKGROUND                     ..................................398
A. The Supreme Court Cases     ................    ......398
B. Lower Courts'Interpretations of the Supreme
Court Cases        ...........................  .....404
II. A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO SCHOOL SPEECH
ISSUES......................................406
A. Special Characteristics of the School Environment..........406
B. Rules for Student Speech Outside School
Sup ervision........................................................................407
1.  Rule  and  Justifications................................................407
2. Supreme Court Support for Full First
Amendment for Student Speech Outside
School Supervision   ............................410
3. True Threats      ...................................411
4. The Special Case of Cyberbullying .....     ........413
C. Rule for Student Speech Occurring Under School
Sup ervision ........................................................................4 17
1.  G eneral A pproach  ....................................................... 417
2. Factors to Consider When Determining
Whether Tinker's Substantial Disruption
Standard Has Been Met..        ...................419
a. Curricular Matters   ................    ......419
b. Location of Speech...       ...................420
c. Type of Restriction-Discriminatory or
Neutral? .................                   420
d. Effect on Political Institutions....................421
e. Effect on Rights of Others ...........   .....421
f. Age of Students.......................422
g. Criticism of School Officials.........    .....422
h. Experience.....................           ......422
3. Concluding Thoughts About the Proposed
Balancing Test for Speech Under School
Supervision  .................................................................423
D. Classifing Speech as Outside or Under School
Supervision when There Are Elements ofBoth.................423

* Professor of Law, University of Detroit-Mercy School of Law, J.D. 1979, Order of the
Coif, Stanford University School of Law.
395