About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



15 J. L. & Religion 267 (2000-2001)
Secrecy, Guilt by Assocation, and the Terrorist Profile

handle is hein.journals/jlrel15 and id is 285 raw text is: SECRECY, GUILT BY ASSOCIATION, AND THE
TERRORIST PROFILE
David Cole t
In March 1998, Hany Kiareldeen, a 30-year old Palestinian
immigrant living in New Jersey, was arrested by United States
immigration authorities and imprisoned. Government officials told him
that his presence in the United States threatened national security. When
Kiareldeen asked why, he was told that the evidence that supported the
charge was secret, and could not be revealed to him because its
disclosure would imperil national security. Kiareldeen spent 19 months
in prison without seeing the evidence that placed him there, until a
federal judge     ruled  in   October    1999    that  his   detention   was
unconstitutional and ordered his release.' The government's principal
source appears to have been Kiareldeen's ex-wife, with whom he was in
a custody dispute over their child. He offered unrebutted testimony that
she had made numerous false allegations against him in the course of the
dispute, all of which had been dismissed by local officials. But one
allegation, that he was associated with terrorists, was passed on to the
FBI, and that allegation landed him in jail on secret evidence for over 19
months.2
Today Hany Kiareldeen is a free man. But U.S. immigration
authorities continue to assert the authority to use secret evidence to lock
up immigrants in deportation proceedings, to exclude aliens at the
border, and to oppose applications for relief from deportation,
including asylum.3 In most such cases, the charges against the alien are
t Professor, Georgetown University Law Center; Volunteer Staff Attorney, Center for
Constitutional Rights.
1. Kiareldeen v. Reno, 71 F.Supp.2d 402 (D.N.J. 1999). The account of Kiareldeen's case
in the text is supported by the district court decision, as well as by the decisions of the
Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals See Matter of Kiareldeen, No. A77-
025-332 (U.S. Immgr. Ct. Apr. 2, 1999) (Dec. of Immgr. J.); Matter of Kiareldeen, No. A77-025-
332 (BIA June 29, 1999) (Moscato, J., dissenting to Dec. Denying Request to Lift Stay of Release
Order); Matter of Kiareldeen, No. A77-025-332 (BIA Oct. 15, 1999) (Dec. on Deportation App.).
2. Matter of Kiareldeen, No. A77-025-332, slip op. at 9 (U.S. Immgr. Ct. Apr. 2, 1999)
(Dec. of Immgr. J.).
3. See, e.g. Testimony of Larry Parkinson, Deputy General Counsel, FBI, before H.R.
Subcomm. on Imnigr. of the Jud. Comm., The Secret Evidence Repeal Act, Hearings on HR.
2121, 106' Cong. 18, 22 (Feb. 10, 2000); Testimony of Bo Cooper, General Counsel, INS before
H.R. Subcomm. on Immgr. Of the Jud. Comm., The Secret Evidence Repeal Act, Hearings on