About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



62 J.L. Pol'y & Globalization 76 (2017)
The Effectiveness of Corruption Eradication: Integrated System Approach

handle is hein.journals/jawpglob62 and id is 77 raw text is: 



ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online)
Vol.62, 2017                                                                                         HE


  The Effectiveness of Corruption Eradication: Integrated System

                                             Approach

                                          Yotham  Th. Timbonga
                       Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Abstract
The  eradication of corruption must be done comprehensively. Therefore, the conventional legal approach has
been inadequate in dealing a systematic and widespread modus operandi of corruption and extraordinary crimes.
This research uses normative-research method. This research was conducted in Makassar as the Capital of South
Sulawesi  Province and  Mamuju   City as the Capital of West  Sulawesi. The  results shows that corruption
eradication as an integrated manner has not been effectively maximized, because it is not supported by sufficient
human  resources, qualified and moral. To create an integrated anti-corruption eradication effectiveness, it is
suggested repressive and preventive actions be undertaken simultaneously and integrated, supported by sufficient
human   resources, qualified and morally supported  by adequate  means  and  costs as well anti-corruption
communities.  In addition, to eradicate corruption as the embodiment of immoral behavior, it is suggested that
moral  education and anti-corruption embed  shameless cultural values to corrupt as national programs and
national movements to create the same motivation, perception and spirit in eradicate corruption.
Keywords:   Corruption, Criminal Law, Integrated System

1. Introduction
At the practical level, corruption has become a social phenomenon and illegal acts. The corruption is increasing
from year to year, both the quantity and the quality. The increasing of corruption can be seen, for example, on
the number of perpetrator and the amount of corrupt money that can be known, not including the corruption that
many  occur and not revealed (hidden crimes). It is known that the impact of corruption as an iceberg (the iceberg
model) in the middle of the ocean. Likewise, in the effort to eradicate corruption, there is always a cynical tone
that the eradication of corruption is done selectively or law enforcement is weak. The increasing of quality (of
course in the negative sense) can be seen in the ways and forms of corruption that also continue to grow and the
courage of perpetrators who are constantly looking for new ways to corrupt.
         By  the increasing of quantity and quality in corruption, then corruption is no longer seen as an ordinary
crime, but it has been classified as extraordinary crime. Therefore, in the effort to eradicate corruption cannot be
done ordinarily, it is needed an extraordinary way for the action and efforts to eradicate it.
         In the current form of corruption, Dirdjosiswono (1984:77) suggests that the forms of corruption have
become  no  longer classifiable as the White-Collar Crimes, but more than have been formed  an embryo  of
organized crime. Several authors gave a different picture of corruption, as Ermansjah Djaja (2010:11) describes
corruption as a disease; corruption in Indonesia has evolved in three stages: elitist, endemic and systemic. In the
elitist stage, corruption is still a typical social pathology within the elite/official sphere. In the endemic stage,
corruption penetrates the reach of the broader society, and the critical stage is when corruption becomes systemic,
that is, when everyone in the system is affordable for corruption. It is possible that the disease of corruption in
this nation has reached the systemic stage.
         Until now, the development  of corruption has been a result of the system of governance that is not
orderly and  not  well supervised  because  the legal basis used  also contains  many  weaknesses   in its
implementation. Supported by a weak system of checks and balances between the three powers, then corruption
is institutionalized and approaches a culture that is almost impossible to eliminate. Almost all members of the
community  cannot avoid the obligation of giving tribute when dealing with government officials, especially in
the field of public services. It does not seem to give any graft is a sin for those with an interest in government
affairs.
         As  described above, it is clear that the eradication of corruption must be done comprehensively.
Therefore, the conventional legal approach has been inadequate in dealing a systematic and widespread modus
operandi of corruption and extraordinary crimes. On the basis of this, the strategy of corruption eradication in
Indonesia should use 4 (four) approaches namely; legal, moralistic and faith, educative and socio-cultural. The
legal approach plays a very strategic role in corruption eradication.
         Thus, a new legal approach is required that places the interests of nation and State or the economic and
social rights of the people above the interests and rights of the suspect or defendant. The new legal approach is in
line with the provisions of Article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations which
assert that restrictions on the rights of individuals may be justified as they are aimed at protecting broader rights
originated in the form of law. The  success of the approach is not solely measured  by the success of the
legislation product but must also be  accompanied  by  consistent law enforcement measures  that are both


76


Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization


WWW.1_1  0