About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



47 Geo. J. Int'l L. 241 (2015-2016)
Redefining Perfidy

handle is hein.journals/geojintl47 and id is 244 raw text is: 




NOTES

                    REDEFINING PERFIDY


                           MATTHEWJ. GREER*

                                ABSTRACT

   Perhaps all war is based on deception, but throughout history, the law of war
has limited the use of certain deceptive tactics. Developed long ago with a focus
on honor among belligerents, the law of war's prohibition of perfidy has failed to
adapt to modern warfare. Moreover, its lack of focus on external actors, i.e.,
non-combatants, allows deceptive action even where it plainly contravenes the
fundamental principles of the law of war. This Note redefines perfidy using the
core aims of the law of war: distinction, proportionality, and military necessity.
The hope is that an updated perfidy definition will provide greater guidance to
battlefield operators, lessen war's death and destruction, and ultimately help
bring about swift and peaceful ends to armed conflicts.

  I.  INTRODUCTION   ....................................            242
  II. THE LAW  OF W AR ..................................            243
      A.   General Principles ..............................         243
      B. Placing Perfidy in the Law of War Framework ...........     245
III. DEFINING PERFIDY AND RUSE: WHERE WE ARE AND How WE
      GOT HERE ......................................... 245
      A. Early Definitions ...............................           247
      B. Modern Definitions .............................            249
           1. International Agreements ...................           249
           2. State Definitions ............................ 251
 IV. WHAT DO UNLAWFUL PERFIDY AND LAWFUL RUSE ACTUALLY
      LOOK LIKE? ........................................ 253
      A. Perfidy in Practice ..............................          253
           1. Additional Protocol I Examples ...............         253
           2. Historical Examples ......................... 256
      B.   Ruse in Practice ................................         258
           1. Traditionally Accepted Practices ..............        259
           2. Historical Examples ......................... 261


    * J.D., magna cum laude, Georgetown University Law Center, 2015; B.S., cum laude, University
of Vermont, 2010. The author thanks Judge James E. Baker for the inspiration for this Note and
for his career of dedicated service to the country. The author also thanks Professor Frances
DeLaurentis and the 2014-15 Senior Writing Fellows for their invaluable commentary on earlier
drafts and the staff of the Georgetown Journal of International Law for their insight and editorial
support. © 2015, MatthewJ. Greer.