About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



58 Clev. St. L. Rev. 273 (2010)
Spirit Food and Sovereignty: Pathways for Protecting Indigenous Peoples' Subsistence Rights

handle is hein.journals/clevslr58 and id is 277 raw text is: SPIRIT FOOD AND SOVEREIGNTY: PATHWAYS
FOR PROTECTING INDIGENOUS PEOPLES'
SUBSISTENCE RIGHTS
ALLISON M. DUSSIAS
I. TAKING THE ROAD TO THE COURTHOUSE: ASSERTING TREATY
FISHING RIGHTS IN NEW JERSEY V. EPA........    ...... 277
A. Ignoring Treaty-Protected Rights: EPA's Backpedaling on
Mercury Emissions Regulation......... ................ 278
B. Harvest of the Waters: The Significance of Fish and
Fishing for the Treaty Tribes............... ............. 283
C. Asserting Treaty Rights in Court: The Arguments of the
Tribal Petitioners... ................................. 285
1. Identifying the Treaty Rights at Stake.................. 285
2. EPA's Flawed Decisions   ....................... 287
3. Treaty Rights, the Environment, and Sovereignty290
D. EPA Unhorsed: The Court ofAppeals Decision......... 292
E. Looking Forward.................            ........ 294
II. SENTINELS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: THE INUIT PETITION TO THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS........... 296
A. The Inuit and Climate Change.................... 298
B. International Legal Principles Recognizing Subsistence
Rights.................................. 300
C. The Effects of Global Warming on Inuit Hunting and
Other Subsistence Rights............................ 303
1. Changes Affecting the Ability to Travel.............. 304
2. Changes Affecting Harvested Foods and Their
Storage...... ......................... 305
3. Changes Affecting the Accuracy of Traditional
Knowledge and Cultural Continuity....   ..... 306
D. The Relief Sought by the ICC and the IACHR's
Response       ..........................  ..... 307
E. Looking Forward.      ...................  ...... 309
* Professor of Law, New England Law|Boston. J.D., University of Michigan; A.B.,
Georgetown University. The author wishes to thank Govind Sreenivasan for his comments on
an earlier draft of this article, and the staff of the Cleveland State Law Review for their
diligent editorial efforts.

273