About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



42 IELR 26 (2026)
Crimes against Humanity and International Criminal Court

handle is hein.journals/ielr42 and id is 27 raw text is: 

INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT LAW REPORTER - Volume 42, Issue 1


criticism. Some authors call the
Statement  a smash-and-grab
performative  intervention.9  The
Dutch  parliament responded  to the
country's decision not to sign the
Letter by passing a motion calling on
the Dutch government   to explore the
possibility of modernizing or revising
treaties such as the ECHR.10

        The  participating countries,
including Finland and the UK,  aim to
develop  a political declaration on these
issues for a future summit, potentially
in May  2026.

        Instead of revising or
amending  the ECHR,   which  entails a
lengthy and cumbersome process,
another option would  be to adopt a
political declaration. This declaration
should have  the status of an
interpretative declaration (rather
than a protocol), thus providing
further guidance on the interpretation
of the ECHR   in the context of asylum
and immigration  policy.
Interpretative declarations are known
in international law. The Court has
stated that it has the authority to
determine  the validity under Article 57
ECHR   (Article 64 at the time) of a
reservation or, where appropriate, of
an interpretative declaration.12

        Such  a declaration may be a
way  for the states to inform and


9  Andrew Forde and Alice Donald, Countdown
to Chisinau: The Risk ofPoliticising the ECHR over
Migration, December 19, 2025,
https://www.ejiltalk.org/countdown-to-chisinau
the-risk-of-politicising-the-echr-over-migration.
10 https://www.echrblog.com/2025/12/an-
exceptional-ministerial-conference.html.
11 Id.


perhaps even  'nudge' the Court in a
certain direction. The declaration is
not specified as having the status of an
interpretative declaration.13
However,  it is doubtful whether this
way  the problem raised in both the
Letter and the Statement could be
solved, and the states involved in the
process will be satisfied.




        Although  neither the Letter nor
the Statement are addressed to the
ECtHR,   it is clear that the Court is the
primary target audience and that the
nine states intend to initiate a change
that is not yet clearly defined. Yet,
governments  must  avoid sending the
message  that if something is politically
difficult in Europe, they simply lower
standards to make their lives easier. To
do so is to risk doing permanent
damage  to the ECHR   system for the
sake of uncertain outcomes  in respect
of immigration  control.14




        Despite so much  bad  news on
Europe's  inability to curb immigration,
the good sign is the decision adopted
by the CoE  Committee   of Ministers to
set the debate on these problems within
the framework  of this organization and
in the context of the ECHR.


12 ECtHR, Be/i/os n. Switkerland (Application no.
10328/83), judgment of 29 April 1983,
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i-001-57434.
13 https://www.echrblog.com/2025/12/an-
exceptional-ministerial-conference.html.
14 Andrew Forde and Alice Donald, supra.
1  Professor Plachta specializes in criminal law
and international criminal law. He has authored
numerous publications on a wide range of


VII.     CRIMES            AGAINST
         HUMANITY                AND
         INTERNATIONAL
         CRIMINAL COURT

ICC  Prosecutor  Opens   Investigation
into Crimes  in El-Fasher

By MichaelPlachtal

        On  November   3, 2025, the
Office of the Prosecutor of the
International Criminal Court
(ICC)  announced  investigations into
crimes allegedly committed  in Darfur
since the outbreak of hostilities in
April 2023.2

        The  Office expressed its
profound  alarm and deepest concern
over recent reports originating from
El-Fasher, which  have found that mass
killings, rapes, and other crimes were
allegedly committed  during the course
of the Rapid Support Forces'  (RSF)
attacks. These atrocities are part of a
broader pattern of violence that has
afflicted the entire Darfur region since
April 2023. The  Office warned that
such acts may  constitute war crimes
and crimes  against humanity under the
Rome   Statute.

        The  legal basis for the
investigations by the ICC in Sudan,
which  is not a state party to the ICC, is
the UN  Security Council (UNSC)


problems concerning law enforcement and
international cooperation in criminal matters. He
currently teaches criminal law and European
criminal law at the University of Security in
Poznan, Poland.
2  https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-
office-prosecutor-situation-el-fasher-north-
darfur.


26