About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 Joint Committee on the Organization of the Congress 1 (1965)

handle is hein.tera/joineeoo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1965 - 2
JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE ORGANIZATION CF THE CONGRESS
Emphasis on Improved Fiscal Control Procedures As New
Study of Congressional Operations Gets Under Way
On May 10 the newly-created Joint Committee on the Organization of
the Congress began several weeks of public hearings, as the opening
phase of its thorough and meaningful study of the operations of
the Congress. The ultimate purpose of this study -- the first of
its kind in 20 years -- is to generate proposals which will result
in major improvements in the organization and operations of the
Congress.
Early this year, Senator Monroney (D-Okla.), with the co-sponsorship
of fifty-six Senators from both parties, introduced legislation
(Senate Concurrent Resolution 2) to establish this special biparti-
san, 12-member Joint Committee of the Congress. Representative
Madden (D-Ind.) introduced a companion resolution in the House, and
50 similar proposals were submitted by House members of all politi-
cal persuasions.
Not requiring Presidential approval, S. Con. Res. 2 passed the Senate
unanimously on March 9. The House on March 11 concluded legislative
action on the measure by a voice vote,
Appointed to the bipartisan unit were: From the Senate -- Senators
Ionroney (D-kla,), Sparkman (D-Ala.), Metcalf (D-Mont.), Mundt
(R-S. Dak.), Case (R-N. J.), and Boggs (R-Del.); from the House --
Representatives Madden (D-Ind.), Brooks (D-Tex.), Hechler (D-W. Va.),
Curtis (R-Mo.), Griffin (R-Mich.), and Hall (R-Mo.). Senator Monroney
and Representative Madden were elected co-chairmen, with Monroney
designated as presiding chairman with authority to make certain
decisions and given primary responsibility in administrative matters,
The committee also established a bipartisan staff, with N. DeVier
Pierson as Chief Counsel, and George Meader, a former U. S. Repre-
sentative from Michigan, as Associate Counsel.
Except for certain technical aspects, such as the amount allotted
for the expenses of the Joint Committee, the recently-approved reso-
lution was identical to that which established the first Joint Ccm-
mittee on the Organization of Congress, in 1945. That committee --
referred to as the LaFollette-Monroney Committee -- submitted a