About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1 1 (October 21, 2002)

handle is hein.tera/crstax0052 and id is 1 raw text is: Order Code RS20712 Updated October 21, 2002 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Charitable Choice, Faith-Based Initiatives, and TANF Vee Burke Domestic Social Policy Division Summary Efforts to pass tax incentives for charitable giving and to assure equal treatment for non-governmental providers of social services, including religious ones, were renewed in late September. Provisions of the original CARE bill (S. 1924) were included in a manager's amendment to the Senate Finance Committee CARE bill (its substitute for the House-passed H.R. 7) and in a manager's amendment to the Homeland Security bill, filed September 24. However, when Senator Santorum on that date asked unanimous consent to proceed on H.R. 7, the Assistant Majority Leader objected, saying some Senators needed more time. The Charitable Choice Act of 2001 (Title II of the House- passed bill) would apply its rules, which are significantly different from those in four existing charitable choice laws, to nine new program areas. The House bill has aroused dispute, especially over possible voucherization of social services and employment discrimination. A large group of religious, civil rights, civil liberties, and education organizations known as the Coalition against Religious Discrimination opposes expansion of charitable choice. On January 8, 2002, a federal judge struck down as unconstitutional direct government funding for a Wisconsin faith-based substance abuse treatment program (Faith Works) that she found was indoctrinating participants in religion. Later, on July 26, 2002, the judge ruled that a contract between the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC) and Faith Works for residential treatment services to offenders did not violate the Establishment Clause because government funds were received only when individual offenders chose to receive treatment there. For background and selected legal issues on public aid and faith-based organizations, see CRS Report RL31043. For a summary of the House-passed H.R. 7, see CRS Report RS20948. This report will be updated for developments. Charitable Choice Option in TANF Law. If a state chooses to administer and provide TANF services or benefits through a contract with a nongovernmental entity or to provide TANF recipients with certificates or vouchers redeemable with a private entity, it must allow religious organizations to participate on the same basis as any other nongovernmental provider without impairing the religious character of the organization and without diminishing the religious freedom of TANF beneficiaries. The law (Section 104 of P.L. 104-193) imposes the following rules: Congressional Research Service ** The Library of Congress