About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1 William Luther, Movie Production Incentives: Blockbuster Support for Lackluster Policy 1 (2010)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/srbhdxz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: t -i on quickest and most generous have landed I In the last decade, state governments have ductions. Other states are left empty-ha gone Hollywood, or tried to, by enacting despite having offered embarrassingly gen dozens of movie production incentives (MPIs), tax abatements to attract filmmakers. in clu d in g tax cred its fo r fi lm p ro d u ctio n . H o l-B a e o n f ci u es m t s of c n r lywood might be expected to wield influence Badonaxnuestates oaecnot in the California state legislature, but it is more act1vieyproduto rojectstate aretL surprising to see movie and TV executives tt throwing their weight around in Louisiana, and taking unnecessary risks with taxpay Massachusetts, Michigan, New Mexico, and dollars. In return, they attract mostly tem South Carolina. All these states and most oth- rary jobs that are often transplanted from ers have enacted MPIs. Those who were other states. States claim to boost job traii