About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 Curtis S. Dubay & Chris Atkins, Providing an Accurate Measure of Ohio's State and Local Tax Burden 1 (2006)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/ffgaxz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: r:OuU NDAT10N.
June 19, 2006
Providing an Accurate Measure of Ohio's State and Local Tax Burden
by Curtis S. Dubay and Chris Atkins
Fiscal Fact No. 60
The Education Tax Policy Institute (ETPI) issued a report in July 2004 criticizing the Tax
Foundation's state and local tax burden estimates for Ohio.' In its report, ETPI examines
state and local tax collections reported by four groups, all of which are based on state and
local tax collection figures from the Census Bureau: the Federation of Tax
Administrators, Congressional Quarterly, the Ohio Department of Taxation and the Ohio
Public Expenditure Council.
According to the ETPI report, each of the four groups ranked Ohio 20th in per capita tax
collections, and either 20th or 22nd as a percentage of income.2 Noting that the Tax
Foundation ranks Ohio's state and local tax burden 11 th highest per capita and 3rd
highest as a percentage of income, the ETPI report concludes that the Tax Foundation has
overstated Ohio's state and local tax burden.
The ETPI report's criticism is not persuasive for several reasons. First, the report
compares Tax Foundation figures from 2004 with other groups' figures from 2000.
Because Ohio's tax burden rose considerably between 2000 and 2004, this is an
illegitimate comparison. The correct comparison would be between fiscal year 2000 tax
collections from the groups listed above with Tax Foundation tax burden estimates for
calendar year 2000. As illustrated in Table 1, when Tax Foundation figures are compared
to other sources on a same-year basis, there is substantially less difference between the
figures.
Table 1: When Compared on a Same-Year Basis, Tax Foundation Figures are Similar to
Census Bureau Figures Used by Other Organizations
::Organization       Per Capita Rank Percent of Income:
Rank
Federation of Tax           20               20
Administrators, 2000
.......................... .............................. .................................................  ..............................
:Congressional              20                20