About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 Kyle Pomerleau, Details and Analysis of Governor Bobby Jindal's Tax Plan 1 (2015)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/detabjintp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








FOUNDATION

FISCAL

FACT
Oct. 2015
No. 484


The Tax Foundation is a 501(c)(3)
non-partisan, non-profit research
institution founded in 1937 to
educate the public on tax policy.
Based in Washington, D.C., our
economic and policy analysis is
guided by the principles of sound
tax policy: simplicity, neutrality,
transparency, and stability.
©2015 Tax Foundation
Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0
Editor, Melodie Bowler
Designer, Dan Carvajal
Tax Foundation
1325 G Street, NW, Suite 950
Washington, DC 20005
202.464.6200
taxfoundation.org


Details and Analysis of

Governor Bobby Jindal's Tax Plan


By  Kyle  Pomerleau
    Economist


Key   Findings

*   Governor Jindal's tax plan would substantially lower individual income
   taxes, eliminate the corporate income tax, and repeal a number of complex
   features in the current tax code.

 *  Governor Jindal's plan would cut taxes by $11.3 trillion over the next
    decade on a static basis. However, the plan would end up reducing tax
    revenues by $9 trillion over the next decade when accounting for economic
    growth from  increases in the supply of labor and capital.

 * The  plan would also result in increased outlays due to higher interest on
   the debt, creating a ten-year deficit somewhat larger than the estimates
   above.

 * According  to the Tax Foundation's Taxes and Growth  Model, the plan would
    significantly reduce marginal tax rates and the cost of capital, which would
    lead to a 14.4 percent higher GDP over the long term, provided that the tax
    cut could be appropriately financed.

 * The  plan would also lead to a 38.3 percent larger capital stock, 8.7 percent
    higher wages, and 5.8 million more full-time equivalent jobs.

 *  On a static basis, the plan would cut taxes for both middle- and high-
    income taxpayers, but would  increase taxes on low-income taxpayers.

 * Accounting  for economic  growth, all taxpayers would see an increase in
   after-tax income of at least 6 percent at the end of the decade.