About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 Jeffrey Owens, Fundamental Tax Reform: The Experience of OECD Countries 1 (2005)

handle is hein.taxfoundation/bpehxz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Feh,-,,,v 20Ni mhep

nce the mid-198(
ive engaged in fui
x systems. These
the need to proN
cal environment:
Lvestment, risk-tal
id which provide ,
d      lL-- -  ---

ndar
refoi
vide
: onc
king
Is inc

I OECD countri(
iental reforms of
Ms have been dri
a more competiti
which encourag,
and entrepreneuw
reased work incet

rates were rarely less than 4) per cc
today most are below 35 per centa
increasing number fall below 25 pc
These reforms, however, did n,
recently, lead to a fall in the overall
(measured by the tax-to-GDP ratic
1975 to 2000, most OECD countj

the same time, governments are aware or
e need to maintain taxpayers' faith in the
tegrity of their tax systems. Fairness and
nplicity have become the bywords of
Formers. Fairness requires that taxpayers in
nilar circumstances pay similar amounts of
Simplicity requires that paying your taxe,
,comes as painless as possible (not some-
ing easily achieved in modern societies) an(
at the administrative and compliance costs
collecting taxes are kept at a minimum.
Almost all the tax reforms of the last two
,cades can be characterized as rate reducing
d base broadening reforms, following the
id given by the United Kingdom in 1984
d the United States in 1986. In the mid-
80s, most OECD countries had top
arginal income tax rates in excess of 65 per
nt. Today it is rare to find top rates above
Iper cent and most OECD countries find
emselves around or below 40 per cent.
milarly, top statutory corporate income tax

experienced an increase in this ratio. Som
like Finland and France, saw the tax burd
increase by almost a third. A small numbi
countries - notably the United Kingdor
F  and the United States - experienced a st
tax burden. It does appear, however, that
s   long-term upward trend peaked in 2000;
d  the latest figures available to the OECD
d  suggest that most countries are now beloN
peak 2000 level.
This paper provides a brief summary
S  major tax reforms, both in policy and adt
istration, in OECD countries, with parti(
emphasis on changes since the year 2000.
Section 2 documents the general trend of
reductions in both tax revenues and rates,
Section 3 examines the diversity in tax
policies across OECD countries, reflectin
diversity in both economic circumstances
policy objectives. Section 4 deals with
developments in tax administration. Fina
section 5 looks at some of the challenges

ey Owens, C
OECD's CG

:fo r

Policy and

LOt, 1.11
.1 tax bt
o). Froi
-ries

I-it
th(
int
sin
ref
sin
tax-
be(
thi
th-C
of
deo
am
lea
am

rd