About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1994 Mississippi Attorney General Reports and Opinions 1 (1994)

handle is hein.sag/sagms0021 and id is 1 raw text is: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICIAL ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION
MIKE MOORE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
August 17, 1994
Henry Palmer, Esquire
Attorney for Kemper County
Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 1677
Meridian, MS 39302-1677
Re: Payment of Claims
Dear Mr. Palmer:
Attorney General Mike Moore has received your request for an
opinion and has assigned it to me for research and reply. Your
letter asks:
In the event a supervisor obtains the proper purchase
paperwork  (i.e. purchase requisition    and purchase
order) to have a county-owned vehicle taken to a
detail shop in an adjoining county to be washed,
waxed, the motor cleaned and the interior cleaned, at
an approximate cost of $50.00, do the supervisors in
reviewing and/or approving the claims docket have the
right to refuse payment if a majority of the board vote
to disallow the claim?
If a claim is disallowed, who is responsible for the
costs incurred in having the vehicle detailed?
As can be seen from the enclosed opinion to John Gregory, dated
6-3-92 (File #224) a purchase order must be had before the board
of supervisors may approve a claim for services or equipment.
Section 19-13-31 governs disposition of claims. This section
provides that the entire board of supervisors must pass upon each
claim presented and states in pertinent part that:
If the board shall reject any such claim in whole or in
part, or refuse, when requested at a proper time, to
pass finally thereon, the claimant may appeal to the
circuit court, or may bring suit against the county on
such claim.  In either case, if the claimant recovers
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Digitized from Best Copy Available