About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1933 Pt. 2 Op. Mo. Att'y Gen. 1 (1933)

handle is hein.sag/sagmo0081 and id is 1 raw text is: CO)NT HIGH AY COLUlSION Power nrid duties WIder Art le 2 Chapter 42, R. K, of Mo. 1 Juyl1st, 9~ F LE E-on. Frank K. Ashby, Prosecui ng Attorney, Charleston, Miss uri. My dear Mr. Ashy'y Your request of June 27th to General Mcittrick for an opinion of this Offi; respecting the County Highway Commissi n and its powers and duties has be n referred to me for reply. For the purposes dt this opinion, I have consolidated yoir questions into the foIlowing form. 1. Is the actual construci'ou of county highways, located, laid out and designated under the pro- visions of Article 2 of Chapter 42 of the Re- vised Statutes of I's:ouri 1929 unde the uper- vision and control of the County Righway Commission subject to the approval of the state Highway Commission? 2. Does the Commission have a right to any money in said District derived either from bond issues or from any other source to spend on the proposed highway, suen highways not exceeding one hundred miles as provided in said Article E? 3. Is the refund money set up on the books of the Highway Department as a liefund Account, the sole fund of Missis ippi County or do the special road districts or other political subdivisions have an interest the ein? 4. Does the County Highway Commission have the right to let the contracts and supervise the spending of this money? 5. Can the County Highway Comission expend this refund money in building new roads which are not in the same part of the county or the same districts as were the roads which were takn over Digitized from Best Copy Available