About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



107 Op. Md. Att'y Gen. 3 (2022)

handle is hein.sag/sagmd0111 and id is 1 raw text is: COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

PROCUREMENT - STATE PERSONNEL - SERVICE CONTRACTS -
PREFERENCE FOR STATE EMPLOYEES - MEANING OF A
PROVISION REQUIRING CERTAIN UNIVERSITIES TO HAVE
POLICIES THAT PROMOTE THE PURPOSES OF § 13-402 OF
THE STATE PERSONNEL & PENSIONS ARTICLE AND THAT
ARE, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE, SIMILAR
TO § 13-218.1 OF THE STATE FINANCE & PROCUREMENT
ARTICLE
January 11, 2022
The Honorable Maggie McIntosh
Maryland House of Delegates
You have requested our opinion on two questions related to
Senate Bill 342 of 2016 (S.B. 342). See 2016 Md. Laws, ch. 65,
codified at Md. Code Ann., State Fin. & Proc. (SFP) § 11-
203(e)(4). That legislation imposed two requirements on the
University System of Maryland (USM), Morgan State University
(Morgan State), and St. Mary's College of Maryland (St.
Mary's College) (collectively, the Universities). First, it
required the Universities to have certain policies that promote the
purposes of § 13-402 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article
(SPP), a provision which establishes a preference for using State
employees, rather than private contractors, to perform certain
services in State-operated facilities. Second, it required that the
Universities' policies must, to the maximum extent practicable, be
similar to § 13-218.1 of the State Finance and Procurement
Article, which establishes a notice-and-conferral requirement
before the issuance of a solicitation for certain service contracts. In
light of those requirements, you asked about what obligations S.B.
342 places on the Universities with respect to their procurement
policies. You also asked whether, and to what extent, the
Universities' current policies comply with S.B. 342's requirements.
As to your first question, there are both procedural and
substantive requirements that the Universities must meet.
Procedurally, S.B. 342 requires the Universities to amend their
procurement policies-not implement the necessary changes
through some other means-and have those amendments approved
by the Board of Public Works (BPW). See SFP § 11-203(e)(3).
Substantively, the Universities' amended policies must
promote the purposes of SPP § 13-402 by implementing a
process for evaluating service contracts that is sufficiently

3