About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1969 Arkansas Attorney General Reports and Opinions 1 (1969)

handle is hein.sag/sagar0030 and id is 1 raw text is: STATLE OF ARKANSAS OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL C (0 P 't April 9. 1969 1-0eas'urer State a4- Aicneas: hi i i eon to your recent riequest of this office in whicb sent on le3 a copy of a contract entered into by you on behalf of your ofice, with Z Equiment Corporation of New York. o if . failed to deliver the equipment covered by the cntct n the a d date, whether you had the right to ter- I, have cnined the contract and have found that the effective aa 0o2 to contract is to be the same as the effective date of you e t contxact with IB Corporation. After that date, 191,2 2.:,.o to rmove its equipment from your office. X HMA fa 1 to deliver replacement equipment by that date, it is mty no rtLnding that the function of your office will be all impaied to the detriment of the State of Arkansas. Ark. Stat Ana. 6 85-2-601 (Uniform Commercial Code) provides tati aeer fil to deliver goods as provided in the con! trct, te buy'er mray reject any goods which subsequently may bha -40liVe:Z.- t o the pInion of this office that if MAX Corporation fails t delivo: the equipment and machines contracted for on or before C:~ dat of the ozpiration of your contract with IBM, you are too / obigated to rescind your contract with MAX and make such a neents with another firm as will insure the continuity