Brief for County of Santa Clara, California; the City of Austin, Texas; the City of Baltimore, Maryland; the City of Beaverton, Oregon; the City of Berkeley, California; the City of Boston, Massachusetts; the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut; the Town of Carrboro, North Carolina; the Town of Chapel Hill, North Carolina; the City of Charleston, South Carolina; the City of Cincinnati, Ohio; the City of Columbia, South Carolina; The County of Dallas, Texas; The District of Columbia; the City of Durham, North Carolina; the City of Flagstaff, Arizona; the City of Gainesville, Florida; the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida; The City of Laredo, Texas; The City of Los Angeles, California; the City of Madison, Wisconsin; the City of Miami Beach, Florida; the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota; the County of Monterey, California; The County of Multnomah, Oregon; The National League of Cities; the City of New Haven, Connecticut; the City of New York, New York; the City of Oakland, California; the City of Omaha, Nebraska; the City of Palo Alto, California; the Mayor of the City of Phoenix, Arizona; the City of Portland, Oregon; the City of Providence, Rhode Island; the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota; Salt Lake City, Utah; the City and County of San Francisco, California; the City of San Jose, California; the City of San Leandro, California; the City of San Luis, Arizona; the County of San Mateo, California; the City of Seattle, Washington; the City of Tualatin, Oregon; the City of Tucson, Arizona;the United States Conference of Mayors and the National Legaue of Cities in Support of Respondent V. 1

About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 [1] (2011)
ARIZONA, et al., PETITIONERS v. UNITED STATES