About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



11 J. Police Crisis Negot. 1 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/wpcn11 and id is 1 raw text is: 


journal ofPolice Crisis Negotiations, 11:1-19, 2011        Routledge
Copyright 0 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC                    Taylor& Francis Group
ISSN: 1533-2586 print / 1533-2594 online
DOI: 10.1080/15332586.2011.523300



         Responding to Threats: A Case Study
         of  Power and Influence in a Hostage
                       Negotiation Event


                       JUSTIN   P. BOROWSKY
               Central Oregon Community College, Bend, Oregon, USA


     One  of the defining characteristics of hostage negotiations is the
     struggle for control that occurs during the negotiation process. In
     bostage negotiation events both parties attempt to exert power in
     order to influence the actions of the other party. This case study re-
     veals that the negotiator and the bostage taker adopt very different
     strategies in order to accomplish these goals. For the bostage taker,
     attempts to exert power within the interaction often take the form of
     threats of barming the bostage. Alternatively, the negotiator exerts
     power  by utilizing various discursive negotiation strategies in or-
     der to develop rapport and conversationalflexibility. This case study
     identifies several strategies employed by the negotiator in order to
     diffuse the bostage taker's threats and demands, while simultane-
     ously exerting power in the interaction.

     KEYWORDS Hostage negotiation, crisis  negotiation, threat, power

                    REVIEW   OF  THE  LITERATURE

Prior to the 1970s, law enforcement officials mainly relied on the use of
intimidation and threats of force to resolve hostage situations (Rogan &
Hammer,   2002). This approach, commonly known  as the Contending Model,
is characterized by the demonstration of superior firepower coupled with ma-
nipulation of the physical environment. For instance, the Contending Model
prescribed tactics such as cutting off the power supply to the building where
the hostage taker had barricaded him- or herself and assembling a heavily
armed  SWAT   Team  in an area that was visible to the hostage taker. The
demonstration of overwhelming  firepower was enacted in order to convince


    Address correspondence to Justin P. Borowsky, MCIS, Central Oregon Community Col-
lege, 2600 NW College Way, Bend, OR 97701. E-mail: jborowsky@cocc.edu


1