About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



12 Va. L. & Bus. Rev. 1 (2017-2018)

handle is hein.journals/valbr12 and id is 1 raw text is: 












VIRGINIA LAW & BUSINESS REVIEW
VOLUME 12                          FALL  2017                   NUMBER 1



        A  CONSUMER BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO
               RESALE PRICE MAINTENANCE

                              Thomas   K. Chengt

                                  ABSTRACT

        This Article reexamines the various pro-competitive justifications and
        theories of harm for resale price maintenance (RPM'), one of the most
        controversial practices in antitrust law. It argues that the existing
        lterature overlooks three important issues regarding RPM, namely, the
        kind of retail serice invoked in a justification, the kind of retailer at
        issue, and the prevaing model of consumer behavior. All three issues
        have important implcations for the plausibity and valdity of the
        various justifications and theories of harm for RPM. It argues that
        most of the existing lterature presumes the inter-brand primacy model
        of consumer behavior. Once this model is not applcable, much of the
        prevaing analysis breaks down and the legaity of RPM  needs to be
        reconsidered. In particular, this Article demonstrates that many of the
        accepted justfiications for RPM  are of doubtful valdity or are only vald
        under lmited circumstances. This lends support to a more hostile biew
        of RPM.

I. INTRODUCTION           ......................................... ..............3

II. SOME PRELIMINARY ISSUES                        ...........................................5
    A. The  Economic  Rationale for RPM..........................5
    B. Single-Brand vs. Multibrand Retailers        ........      ...............10
    C. A Taxonomy of   Retail Services.  ..................       ..........11

    Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong; thomas.cheng@hku.hk.
    The Author would like to thankJoshua Kanjanapas, Karen Tsan& Stephanie Chen, Holly
    Lau, Harry Chan, and Max Chan for their able research assistance.

Copyright C 2017 Virginia Law & Business Review Association


1