About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


11 U. St. Thomas J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/tjlpp11 and id is 1 raw text is: RELATIONAL PRIVACY: SURVEILLANCE, COMMON KNOWLEDGE, AND COORDINATION ROBERT H. SLOAN* AND RICHARD WARNER I.RELATIONAL PRIVACY ..................................... ...... 7 A.THE CHARACTERISTIC PATTERN. .............. .................... 8 B.THE SELF .......................9...... ........................9 II.INFORMATIONAL NORMS ................1........................1 A.COORDINATION NORMS ..................1.......................1 B.COORDINATION AND KNOWLEDGE ............... ................ 13 1.FIRST-LEVEL KNOWLEDGE ....................................... 13 2.THE CONTRIBUTION OF COMMON KNOWLEDGE ..................... 14 III.How COMMON KNOWLEDGE ARISES ...................... ....... 16 IV.How COMMON KNOWLEDGE CAN COLLAPSE ..................... 17 A.LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF EACH OTHER'S CONFORMITY ...... ....... 18 B.LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF NORM-CONSISTENT INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............................................. 19 V.THREE SCENARIOS ............................................. 20 A.COMMON KNOWLEDGE AND COORDINATION PERSIST . .............. 20 B.COMMON KNOWLEDGE COLLAPSES, CONFORMITY PERSISTS................ 22 C.COORDINATION COLLAPSES ..................................... 23 VI.CONCLUSION.................................................. 24 * Professor and Head, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago. Partially supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. DGE-106931 1. Professor of Law, Chicago-Kent College of Law, Visiting Foreign Professor, University of Gdaisk, Poland. We presented an earlier version of this article at Protecting Virtual You: Individual and Informational Privacy in the Age of Big Data, The University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy fall symposium. We thank the other participants and the audience for their helpful questions and suggestions. We owe particular thanks to Alan Rubel, who also presented at the conference, for his insightful comments and for his work on education surveillance, which has been an essential resource.