About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


53 St. Mary's L.J. 1 (2021-2022)

handle is hein.journals/stmlj53 and id is 1 raw text is: ARTICLE JUDICIAL FEDERALISM AND THE APPROPRIATE ROLE OF THE STATE SUPREME COURTS: A 20-YEAR (2000-2020) STUDY OF THESE COURTS' INTEREST EVALUATIONS OF THE FRUITS AND THE ATTENUATION DOCTRINES DANNYE HOLLEY* Introduction............................................................................................... 2 I. SCOTUS and its Evolution of the Fruits and Attenuation Doctrines: An Interest Analysis Including Initial Flagging of the Role of Race and Caste & Defining the Parameters for Inclusion of State Supreme Court Decisions in the Study ............ 5 A. Defining the Scope of the Study ...................................................11 B. Identifying the Criteria for Determining Whether a State Supreme Court Decision is Within the Scope of the Study......12 II. Allocation of the Burdens of Proof-Burden of Production and Burden of Persuasion with Respect to the Fruits and Attenuation Doctrines............................................................................12 III. The Fruits Doctrine in the State Supreme Courts from 2000-2020................................................................................................17 1 * B.A. and J.D., State University of New York, Buffalo. LL.M., University of California, Berkeley. Professor of Law and Dean Emeritus, Thurgood Marshall School of Law, Texas Southern University.